On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Several women, including on WikiProject Feminism on the English
Wikipedia, have recently expressed concern about the number of
photographs of women's body parts that Wikimedia hosts, particularly
regarding the issue of
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction
are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are
self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs. What
processes should we
Here is the deletion log, for reference, regarding African American women
it looks like the desire was to have it used as a main category and then
have sub categories added to it, and I think that makes sense, but I also
understand some aren't categorized.
From WP:Feminism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Outrageous_male_bias
Man our talk page has been blowing up lately
The article for [[childfree]] is just as weird, including this odd photo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Motivations
So glad we have a
The article for [[childfree]] is just as weird, including this odd photo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Motivations
So glad we have a photo of a guy doing research to illustrate
this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Statistics_and_research
The same user, Tesseract2, added
(I am particularly concerned with bulk uploads from other services
that don't have such policies in place, such as Flickr, because
provenance and consent becomes very difficult to trace in that case.)
climb on favorite hobby horse at first
This is, of course, another side effect of our overly
