Re: [Gendergap] Hotties are always hot

2013-11-16 Thread Emily Monroe
Er, at least there's males listed under the see also section. That doesn't change my opinion of this essay, though. It's clearly sexist. Perhaps talk to GlassCobra about this? From, Emily On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote: Stumbled across this

Re: [Gendergap] Hotties are always hot

2013-11-16 Thread Nathan
Meh, it's a relic of a different era on Wikipedia. Almost all of the people who have edited are, like GlassCobra, admins or former admins. Its also in his userspace, not the Wikipedia: namespace. ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Gendergap] Hotties are always hot

2013-11-16 Thread Emily Monroe
What concerns me is that a newbie, with a penchant of getting on the weird sides of websites like I do, might find it. From, Emily On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote: Meh, it's a relic of a different era on Wikipedia. Almost all of the people who have edited are,

Re: [Gendergap] Hotties are always hot

2013-11-16 Thread Emily Monroe
It might turn them off from editing Wikipedia if they believe in respecting women. From, Emily On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.comwrote: What concerns me is that a newbie, with a penchant