Hi Risker / Anne,
In response to the points you raise:
* A panel suggests a group of people who discuss and decide things, it wouldn't
be that, it would be a pool of adjudicators.
* The home page shows 130,858 active editors, if 15% of those are female then
it means there must be 19,628 female
That’s really cool.
(Just don’t read the comments. Awful misogyny contained therein. Is
there any way we can get that crap removed?)
--
Tom Morris
http://tommorris.org/
- Original message -
From: Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
Speaking personally, whenever I am asked what my gender is, I say do not
want to answer; if that isn't an option, I have refused to join sites
before. As often as not, that information is used to categorize and
ghetto-ize people. I'm gobsmacked that you've found most people post their
gender on
While I've barely had a chance to read through proposal and comments,
I'd like to just ask re the below which applies generally right now:
On 7/7/2014 9:35 AM, Risker wrote:
I know what it's like to have my inbox flooded with requests for
assistance in relation to dispute resolution - just
On 7 July 2014 09:51, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
While I've barely had a chance to read through proposal and comments, I'd
like to just ask re the below which applies generally right now:
On 7/7/2014 9:35 AM, Risker wrote:
I know what it's like to have my inbox flooded
Hi there,
I'm flagging the major issues that need to be considered.
1) we can not promise anonymity for the people acting as adjudicators. Any
attempt to have anonymous people hearing a case will attract attention from
a group if obsessive people who out anyone who is anonymous. Plus at times
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sydney Poore sydney.po...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I'm flagging the major issues that need to be considered.
1) we can not promise anonymity for the people acting as adjudicators. Any
attempt to have anonymous people hearing a case will attract attention
On 7 July 2014 13:00, Daniel and Elizabeth Case danc...@frontiernet.net
wrote:
2) the reasons that people enforcing the rules on Wikipedia ignore
incivility, harassment, and trolling is because that approach is often the
best way to stop attention seeking behavior. The idea to not feed
