On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not going to opine on the decision that's being voted upon by Arbcom;
I've been there, and ultimately the decision is based on the quality and
nature
of the evidence that people bother to present
Risker, I think your
Kevin Gorman wrote: The case is ending with banning a bunch of women
with flimsy excuses..
That's a gross misrepresentation of the case outcome.
The case is ending with Carol Moore being banned off for reasons which
should be obvious to anyone reading through the case documentation and
knowing
Carol's productive contributions outweigh the trolling she's been put
through and occasional policy issue she has run in to, at least not to the
point of warranting a site ban. Neotarf is being topic-banned from a
project they were a productive contributor to on a handful of flimsy
diffs. I'd
Eric Corbett is going to be under a new regimen of non-appealable civility
blocks under the aegis of Arbitration Enforcement.
One wonders if it’s really time for someone to just initiate a discussion on AN
as to whether the community’s patience with him is exhausted enough to
community-ban
On 11/26/2014 1:37 PM, Kevin Gorman wrote:
It's noteworthy that they are not non-appealable blocks. I honestly
don't think this is beyond the scope of the list, although it's
certainly a depressing topic. Allowing severe gendered slurs to be
bandied about with essentially no penalty is
Damn straight!
Shit stirrers unite :)
(And yes, until you've met Carol Moore in person you don't know the real
Carol Moore!! She's most epic and well worth it to go out of your way to
have a pint with her!).
-Sarah
[I've just shifted my shit starting back to GLAM stuff these days...]
On Wed,
