nice soundcloud clips at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/women-in-stem
that could be added to external links.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Perhaps you can help! See this tweet:
https://twitter.com/SmithsonianArch/status/547456611988824069
Please
On 12/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nathan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Leigh Honeywell le...@hypatia.ca
mailto:le...@hypatia.ca wrote:
With my mod hat on, Neotarf, please cease the you could's here.
Further hypotheticals will get you modded.
Thanks,
-Leigh
What about
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
http://www.examiner.com/article/wikipedia-biographies-favor-men
http://www.examiner.com/article/jimmy-wales-shows-favoritism-on-wikipedia
hmmm, interesting but dated...
On 24 December 2014 at 11:22, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
http://www.examiner.com/article/wikipedia-biographies-favor-men
http://www.examiner.com/article/jimmy-wales-shows-favoritism-on-wikipedia
hmmm,
Please avoid using Examiner articles. Unreliable sources...it's user
created content like Wikipedia.
And what Nathan said. Please tread lightly. (From personal experience!!)
Sarah
On Dec 24, 2014 8:22 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Carol Moore dc
Yahoo this time in Canada.
http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/1247529/mount-royal-university-womens-studies-class-aims-to-take-back-piece-of-wikipedia/
--
Sarah Stierch
-
www.sarahstierch.com
___
Gendergap mailing list
It looks like the editors mentioned in the article could use some
assistance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Samantha_Nock_-_A_Halfbreed%27s_Reasoning
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Yahoo this time in Canada.
I confess, I got took link-wise. I've been trying to ignore the nasty
people on Wikipediocracy and was
not sufficiently diligent when one seemed nice.
Nevertheless, I think it would be problematic if GGTF banned editors in
a questionable arbitration
were not permitted to make reasonable
