One more, by Andy Cush:
http://internet.gawker.com/the-gamergate-decision-shows-exactly-whats-broken-about-1682639327
Quote:
Maher's email, and the official Wikipedia statements on Gamergate, are
careful to point out that the arbitration committee has the authority to
govern disputes about the
Thanks! I was told we are using some tools internally to track specific
edit-a-thon outcomes - is this what you mean? We want to track more than
just edit-a-thon outcomes though
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com wrote:
Very cool! Good luck to
Very cool! Good luck to you. Just a quick response to the first question:
I definitely think it's doable to get 5 editors to stay on for 5 months. The
evaluation team should be able to help you with tools and guides to measure
this.
My advice is to use the person-to-person method. That is, you
I think that the evaluation team are working on other tools as well, but I am
not sure. We haven't used their tools for our editathons, although they are
probably better than our self-edited stats, since our goal is also to have fun
:-)
Best wishes,
Lennart Guldbrandsson
070 - 207 80 05
yes, Wikimedia DC was using some opt in tracking of editathons outcomes.
and reporting activity in annual report
http://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Annual_report_%282012%E2%80%932013%29
there are some case studies at GLAM wiki
