[Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Maia Weinstock
Hi all, There have been numerous discussions among folks in the space exploration community that use of the word manned and unmanned in Wikipedia is outdated and gender-biased. Unfortunately, going in and fixing all of these by hand would be rather labor-intensive... Someone recently created a

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread J Hayes
you can also do a bot request here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:09 PM, JJ Marr jjm...@gmail.com wrote: You should ask down at the village pump, then if the response is favorable, start a BRFA. On Feb 24, 2015 10:04 PM, Maia Weinstock

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Kerry Raymond
The mechanics of doing this aren't such a big deal. AutoWikiBrowser is probably the best way to do it as you can eyeball each change before it happens just to make you that you haven't done something inappropriate (like the unmanned vehicle example). It's a little tedious (to eyeball each one) but

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Kerry Raymond
I just had a look. The category Space exploration's complete closure is around 8000 articles. I ran a quick speed check with AutoWikiBrowser. It can skip an article that doesn't contain manned in about 1 second (no human action required) and it takes however long you take to make the decision