On 4/10/2015 6:33 PM, Siko Bouterse wrote:
This is the grant proposal referenced at the end of that article
(currently under review as part of Inspire):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/More_Female_Architects_on_Wikipedia
I remember NOT commenting on that one because I figured,
Can anyone point to where this troll behavior happened? There don't seem
to be a lot of specifics in this article, and I'm wondering if it's gender
trolls (which are, alas, plentiful) or a culture clash between old editors
and new ones over unfamiliar policies?
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM,
t think they were referring to this deletion discussion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pia_Ednie-Brown
and this declined AfC
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jennifer_Taylor_%28architect%29oldid=650496415
the list shows a lot of positive work done
On
One can always just study the relevant articles.
But often it's a double standard in application of policies.
So if it's a guy architect with a couple low quality refs,
people won't even bother to notice or respond.
But if it's a woman architect with 7 or 8 solid ones,
it becomes a cause celebre
