Responding to WSC: In many settings, including healthcare, higher
education, and certain industries, ALL staff are provided with
anti-harassment training; it's often treated as an extension of basic
health and safety training, and is frequently mandatory. It has nothing to
do with the gender iden
Ach, I didn't realize they were citing research from 15 years ago. Also it
is more about the type of in-person situations that Berkeley and other
campuses have found themselves in the courts over recently, and not the
type of online harassment that WP needs to solve (not to minimize the
importance
The transcript of law professor Danielle Citron's online harassment speech
to Wikiconference USA has been posted to WikiSource:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Danielle_Citron_speaks_at_WikiConference_USA_2015
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wik
On 05/04/2016 09:24 AM, Neotarf wrote:
> although you would think the Gruniad would not report on something
> that was obviously flawed.
It's hard to know Gruniad's intention, given the research articles are also
relatively old (not just published or forthcoming):
1. Bingham & Scherer (2001)
2.
It goes without saying that a meaningful study should have a random
selection process, although it happens all the time that researchers can't
always get ideal populations so they study the populations they have.
Unfortunately the study is behind a paywall, so you can't see how it was
designed, alt
