Thanks to those who have sent me the info on the list. I've reported
it for spam and other -- unfortunately Google doesn't appear to
let you add any comments.
If anyone is still a member of the list and they make the membership
list available check to see if this Russavia is
russavia.wikipe
And here is Sanne wearing pink badges --
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7405752@N06/2513156755/in/photolist-4Q5zWT-4Q9PEs
And here is Sanne standing directly next to some big arsed pink
balloons --
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7405752@N06/2513983346/in/photolist-4Q9PEs
I am guessing that she
...@palnatoke.org wrote:
You never know with allergies - it could be a recent development :-)
More seriously: I guess pink is given the connotations of cutesy,
little-girl-donesn't-know-a-thing and such.
-Ole
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
And here is Sanne
. A good start would be getting it up as a DYK first.
Cheers
Russavia
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Russavia is indefinitely blocked on enwiki, so perhaps recommending he post
this is not the best solution. However, anyone else can feel free to add
what
of the world, and their achievements,
to a wider audience -- which I guess is part of the reason for this
group.
If anyone's interested, I can continue to expand on this list with
suggestions; just let me know.
Cheers,
Russavia
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote
Well you do realise that now you are an admin your days of browsing any
type of pr0n are behind you. ;)
You are right, no-one in their right mind would use Commons to search for
pr0n. I just did a search for big dick on Google, and there is one result
from a WMF project in the Top 100 results --
Well you do realise that now you are an admin your days of browsing any
type of pr0n are behind you. ;)
You are right, no-one in their right mind would use Commons to search for
pr0n. I just did a search for big dick on Google, and there is one result
from a WMF project in the Top 100 results --
. But in your
current nom, scope won't be an issue.
Hope this gives you a little bit of basic understanding of how, I at
least, approach DR's on Commons.
Cheers,
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org
/Jayen466)
clearly demonstrate that it is more important for you to troll off the
project, than it is do anything remotely useful on the project.
Regards,
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
that for a pandora's box?
Regards,
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
separate
occasions last year, and did nothing about it. (as far as I can tell).
Regards,
Russavia
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Pete, that photograph is from The Official White
expectation not to be photographed there.
These are all the types of distinctions that we on Commons make every
day; day in day out.
Regards,
Russavia
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe
Erik, et al
Just a heads up that I have responded to your question at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Russavia#Evidence_of_consent
I invite all gender gap list members to come to Commons to read what
is written, and get involved.
Cheers,
Russavia
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:22 PM
on this list (and elsewhere) and make proposals on Commons instead for full
community input.
I hate to tell you this, but blowing hot air on this list or on other
websites will not bring about change. As I've stated, it's all about the
venue.
Cheers,
Russavia
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Andreas
and join us.
Are you up for that challenge?
Cheers,
Russavia
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Katherine Casey
fluffernutter.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Russavia, from the perspective of many people here, blowing hot air on
Commons is the least likely to bring about change of any of the options you
should be ashamed. I mean, yes,
they'd have ended up decapitated, but they'd have been part of the solution!
We just need a few more people to get nibbled on before the lions' teeth
will be far too worn down to bite anyone else.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe
Indeed, we could have a twice or thrice daily thread on English
Wikipedia about that very project, couldn't we?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
Quite honestly, is it any wonder when people make such statements that
editors from Commons basically
And yet we have a problem on the amount of cock pics on Commons? Seriously?
Any time you feel like reasonable discussion on things Ironholds, feel
free to chime in; because your comments were nothing more than
ill-informed opinion.
Cheers,
Russavia
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Oliver Keyes
breathe!
Cheers,
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Would you like the board to adopt and amend a resolution based purely
upon the opinions of editors who are members of this mailing list, or
do you intend to open it up to discussion for the wider, including the
Commons, community?
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you feel that is sufficient? This would make it clearer that editors
are expected to obtain subject consent before uploading images taken in
private situations to Wikimedia websites.
Define private situations.
Actually, it's total gobbledygook.
But can you confirm that what you take it to mean is that quite simply
consent is required if the photo is taken in a private place with an
expectation of privacy?
Cheers
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Fluffernutter)
they would see that for themselves, instead of relying on ridiculous
assertions being peddled by others.
C'mon now.
Russavia
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Katherine Casey
fluffernutter.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh dear, I'm not sure there's enough
that you ask these questions on Commons, perhaps on
my talk page, which I will answer there, and we can then move to a
suitable Commons venue, so that discussion can be opened up to the
community-at-large, instead of being limited to this small group.
Is that ok with you?
Cheers,
Russavia
The best idea I've seen!
If a subject area is lacking on Commons, the best way to go about it
is to upload more photos, so that the one or two naturist photos
blend in.
Look forward to seeing more images in that category in the future. :)
Cheers,
Russavia
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:54 AM
I am getting plenty more results than what we have on Commons.
I am suspecting that a bad example was chosen here, because they are
HOT SPRINGS; which generally means that nudity is allowed, and given
what they are, it's generally to be expected. Unless of course we want
to turn back the clocks
,
Russavia
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com
any context of the dismissal from the
article, and that is not a good thing.
Russavia
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote
-and-misogyny-via-wikipedia/
Andreas
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Gillian White whiteghost@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree that notoriety, as opposed to notability, is not a good precedent
for Wikipedia, whether the subject is man or woman.
Gillian
On 13 June 2012 23:11, Russavia
imagem, and someone reported on it.
Anyone wishing to get their bio onto WP should use this case as an
example of how to go about it.
The article should be at AfD, because as it stands now, it is
everything that WP is not.
Russavia
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com
30 matches
Mail list logo
