On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
**
If you really want some entertainment, you should try reading the dating
article. It includes such mind-blowing revelations as:
Mr. Kaldari?
Best.
Post.
Ever.
___
Philippe Beaudette
Head of
:
-Original Message-
From: Nathan
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Am I crazy?
I question whether college dating deserves an article to begin with.
If it does, which the text of the article
I've never particularly felt the boys club atmosphere on Wikipedia
that apparently deters some women. However, I am very angry right now.
I tried to add [[date rape]] as a see also link to the very
incomplete article [[college dating]]. The relevance seemed obvious to
me. It was removed by
Well, it's not rectified yet. The one source I've given thus far is
not enough apparently. I have to add more.
The see also was not merely questioned before, it was removed (with
one edit summary being seriously, wtf?)
LoS
On 10/24/11, Daniel and Elizabeth Case danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
*It would not have to be a gender related issue for this to occur.*
Fred is right in that point. I'm not a gender editor (my articles almost
never have problems with gender issues), however, the topic is one where you
can find the most biased people on earth: Religion.
And I would say you
Not convinced by the AfD. Snow kept after less than 24 hours, based
on one substantial vote and a bunch of what he said votes that
didn't address whether college dating is so distinct a phenomena
that it needs to be treated separately from [[dating]]. A search
string of +college +dating is
://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
On 24 October 2011 11:16, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nathan
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Am I crazy?
I
