On 9 June 2014 23:34, Lennart Guldbrandsson l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com wrote:
Some language versions of Wikipedia do have gender categorization, such as
Swedish and German Wikipedia. (The English categories exist but are not used
very much.) Here's a link to the Swedish ones:
Hi all,
I ran a few quick updates on Max's numbers today. As of 9/6/14:
* WIkidata has ~2080k items marked as people
* Of these, ~1893k have a gender property (91%)
(Magnus's games are doing an amazing job at filling out these numbers,
by the way - http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=213 )
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
wrote:
Hi all,
I ran a few quick updates on Max's numbers today. As of 9/6/14:
* WIkidata has ~2080k items marked as people
* Of these, ~1893k have a gender property (91%)
(Magnus's games are doing an amazing job at
On 9 June 2014 20:21, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
* WIkidata has ~2080k items marked as people
* Of these, ~1893k have a gender property (91%)
Can you define item in this context?
Item here is a single Wikidata entry:
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q320
which may correspond to one
världens samlade kunskap. Det är vårt mål.
Jimmy Wales
From: andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:44:17 +0100
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Sex Ratios in Wikidata Part III
On 9 June 2014 20:21, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
* WIkidata has
Hi Everyone,
I just conducted some new research I though you might be intrigued by.
- It compares the sex or gender labels in use by Wikidata today - 13
in total.
- The percentage of articles about females by language.
- The best are Serbian Wikipedia, or Urdu Wikipedia,
