On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:01, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
The problem with all of this on Wikimedia is the anonymity factor.
People could say I am the model and I hereby give consent. I don't
know how we get round that.
Sarah
Especially when the images are
Especially when the images are scraped off the CC-BY and CC-BY-SA Flickr
streams.
That was something I noticed the other day. An anon replaced the
infobox image on Veganism with a close-up shot of a woman's genitals
and a vibrator. I looked to see who had uploaded it and it said Flickr
And as a note - when you review the content that users are uploading using
Bryan's bot, the MAJORITY of it is educational content. Nothing
questionable or too contorversial.
It seems the biggest problems come from a freedom of panorama, nudity/porn,
and celebrity images uploaded to Flickr with
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
While I support the use of technology, I also fear that people put so much
trust into this technology they aren't aware of the lame content being
uploaded. They love to reiterate that if the bot approves it it's okay
