Sumana,
Yes, gladly. I feel that thread has served a good purpose, but it's true,
it's been at the expense of flooding the list with a lot of noise, and I've
contributed some of it. I do think that after a prolonged long dip into
less productive discussion, in the last exchange we have arrived at
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.comwrote:
Sumana,
Yes, gladly. I feel that thread has served a good purpose, but it's true,
it's been at the expense of flooding the list with a lot of noise, and I've
contributed some of it. I do think that after a prolonged
Sarah, 14/05/2013 08:46:
Hi Sumana and Pete, I would object to closing any thread down. If people
don't want to read the thread, that's fine, but if others are discussing
it, please allow that.
You can as well continue with private email.
A posting rate limit has also proved successful on
I agree with Sarah: the thread should stay, tagged with [Commons] as Erik
has suggested.
We are actually making progress – painful progress at times, but
significant progress nevertheless.
Andreas
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21
I'm not sure I see the pressing reason why this thread needs to go on-wiki.
Commons doesn't have a venue for discussing problems this fundamental with
it as far as I know, and people have spoken in this thread who either do
not or will not participate on-wiki on Commons. Moving the thread on-wiki
Well, I haven't read ANY of the emails in the thread, for the petty reason
that the subject line makes me cringe every time I see it. And according to
my gmail count there's something like 100 mails on the topic, so I'm
probably not going to start now. So if indeed there is actual progress
being
Phoebe, I would really suggest reading the emails if you're interested in
the discussion (or, conversely, not asking for a summary if you're not),
but here's a quick-and-dirty condensation off the top of my head:
I started the thread to discuss how disposition of topless photo of a woman
on
Thanks. That helps a lot, really, and I will skim the emails now. I really
didn't know what the topic of this extensive discussion *was* before, and
didn't have the stomach for another protracted censorship discussion.
thanks again,
-- phoebe
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Katherine Casey
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2013-May/thread.html
shows me that Topless image retention -don't give up has stretched on
pretty long, and it seems to me like it might be better suited to onwiki
discussion instead. Maybe the posters who are very interested in
engaging in that
I second your proposal.
On 5/13/2013 9:36 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2013-May/thread.html
shows me that Topless image retention -don't give up has stretched on
pretty long, and it seems to me like it might be better suited to onwiki
discussion
10 matches
Mail list logo
