This case presents a good argument for flagged revisions. Given that the
people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and
changes would have been visible to the public.
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
Hi Gillian,
thank you for
I'm not so sure. As soon as the incident was noted, the article was
semi-protected, which solved the problem.
Perhaps you are suggesting flagged revisions for *all* biographies of
living persons (BLPs), by default?
-Pete
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
It also gives a good argument for admins actually applying semi-protection
properly. BLPs under attack should always have a LONG semi-protection that
can be shortened if it is determined the risk is abated. I was fairly
flabbergasted to see a very brief SP applied when it was obvious there was
a
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not so sure. As soon as the incident was noted, the article was
semi-protected, which solved the problem.
Perhaps you are suggesting flagged revisions for *all* biographies of
living persons (BLPs), by default?
I wouldn't call that an AFD
It was open for an entire hour and a half.
Yeah it sucks she met trolls on the internet -- god knows this isn't
something new for Wikipedia -- but she just isn't notable.
In fact, this is now setting a precedent that any blogger who has been
interviewed by another
I do have to say - it is a challenge explaining to people You're not
notable just because you're a popular blogger. Even if you beat people
over the head with notability guidelines articles still crop up.
Perhaps we need to draft a list on Wiki of notable bloggers =)
Sarah
On 6/15/12 1:07
Hi Gillian,
thank you for this information
do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list might
take, in this case as well as
generally?
open for suggestions,
Claudia
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote
Hi All,
The Community is aware of this
Well, I've taken a look at the history and have identified BLP violations
going back to October 2011; as such, I've extended the existing
semi-protection for a full year. Some extensive cleanup has already taken
place, as well as some useful article expansion.
Risker/Anne
On 13 June 2012 02:04,
I've had a look at the article, and I can't believe that this hasn't
yet undergone AfD.
As it says on the talk page, being a feminist and having a blog and
youtube channel doesn't make one notable.
There are no reliable sources in the article which discuss Sarkeesian
in-depth -- there is an
I agree that notoriety, as opposed to notability, is not a good precedent
for Wikipedia, whether the subject is man or woman.
Gillian
On 13 June 2012 23:11, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had a look at the article, and I can't believe that this hasn't
yet undergone AfD.
10 matches
Mail list logo
