Fae, I have been skeptical of your initial post here (it's hard for me
to see a strong basis for believing those giving the speeches have
relinquished rights), but I very strongly agree with the principle you
articulate here -- it's very important to apply consistent standards.
Readers here
I encourage participation at the RFC I have put forward:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/videos_of_speeches
With either outcome suggested, the implementation should be consistent
for all Commons videos, regardless of source, content or the person
making a speech.
Hi,
The problem I see is that the speeches possibly deleted will in this case
concern women when we alleeady have a gender gap. I would, like Fae, advocate
to start with men speeches.
Kind regards,
Nattes à chat
> Le 30 janv. 2017 à 13:14, Fæ a écrit :
>
> Advocate for
yeah- nominating VOA video for deletion is proof of the cultural bias - so
it goes
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring
> we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases
> chosen
Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring
we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases
chosen because they are about a Women's march in the news. The most
common interpretation of that would be advocating for fairness in
approach.
Fae
On 30
Two wrongs don't make a right and using this mailing list to advocate for
that crosses a line.
On Jan 30, 2017 05:11, "Fæ" wrote:
> Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_
> requests/File:Activist_Gloria_Steinem_Tells_Women%27s_March_
>