Carol: My guess is that pretty much everyone commenting here has and
continues to, read the GGTF case. I also agree that Eric can be harsh and
his use of certain words offends people. Likewise others in this case also
didn't act very well.
Personally I think the term he used or the references you
Tim: They actually are appealable at AE, they just can't be as undone as
quickly as most Eric blocks. Consensus needed to unblock rather than
consensus needed for a block to stay. I suspect most of the initial blocks
will stick since they aren't too long, but the remedy does call for set
longer
On 11/27/2014 12:36 PM, Reguyla wrote:
Carol: My guess is that pretty much everyone commenting here has and
continues to, read the GGTF case. I also agree that Eric can be harsh
and his use of certain words offends people. Likewise others in this
case also didn't act very well.
Personally I
Test. To see if my message appears on [Gendergap].
Marie
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Okay, so this is the last message that I had in my e-mail inbox (it's from 4
September 2014).
I've checked my settings and they show me as still subscribing to the list and
the check-box to receive the messages is ticked.
Can someone please look into how I've dropped off the system?
Thanks
Check your spam folder and spam filters - many of us have had problems from
time to time with mailing list posts winding up in spam or junk.
Risker
On 29 November 2014 at 16:05, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
Okay, so this is the last message that I had in my e-mail inbox (it's from
4
Check your spam folder
On Nov 29, 2014 4:05 PM, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
Okay, so this is the last message that I had in my e-mail inbox (it's from
4 September 2014).
I've checked my settings and they show me as still subscribing to the list
and the check-box to receive the
Not sure if this will produce a new thread or attach to the existing one (I've
checked my spam folder, there's nothing there) but anyway
Tim: I just wondered whether you regard this:
To quote you in the context of your dispute over a video, you say I
dispute that it makes little sense and why does it even need to add
informational value? Why can't it just be to add aesthetics to the article
as pictures and videos often are? I ask why don't you take that dispute up
with the
