Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if
Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a project
from the real world were lot of forces prevent women from editing : lower
confidence in themselves, less free time, lower access to education.
We can't
Hi all,
Actually, I would also love to write a book with no rigor, so I sympathize with
the idea. Sorry I missed this. As one of the two female board members of the
Dutch Wikimedia organization I feel compelled to contribute to this page.
Unfortunately I am not sure when I will have time. I
I'm not familiar with the discussion you are referring to, but I'm 100%
sure Jimmy would never say that as it is completely antithetical to his
position on Wikipedia editing. Do you happen to remember where you read
that?
Ryan Kaldari
On 2/1/12 11:53 PM, Caroline Becker wrote:
Yeah, and
That was irony, sorry :) I'm against image filtering and I think image
filtering has nothing to do with gender gap, so I answered with my guts
instead of my brain :(
Caroline
2012/2/2 Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
**
I'm not familiar with the discussion you are referring to, but I'm
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
don't understand how to edit (usability) or other reason. First, you have to
understand why women leave. When you solves that, every woman that arrives,
Thanks Sarah!
Nina
Sendt fra min iPhone
Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 22:15 skrev Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
don't understand how to edit (usability) or other
Hi everyone,
I'm really happy to see that Wikiproject India (in English Wikipedia)
has taken up a new initiative spearheaded by User:Ashlin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Women_and_gender_issues
Perhaps you'll feel the urge to participate, or maybe find inspiration
