On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
As I have said before, I am happy to work with you or anyone on drafting a
better policy. (I realize you offered a two word edit, but in my
Hello again Andreas
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at the upload stream, they come up quite regularly, including
images of minors, uploaded again and again under different user names,
according to a mail I received from Philippe a couple
Russavia and Andreas, I want to take this opportunity to point out that the
style of argument the two of you have been engaged in since last night is
exactly what some of us mean when we refer to an aggressive atmosphere
that makes us uncomfortable on the projects. Turning a disagreement over
how
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Help_cleaning_up_Category:Prostitutes
Ryan Kaldari
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Allegations of prostitution are allegations of illegal activities in many
jurisdictions, which makes any unsourced edits accusing people in
those jurisdictions of prostitution potentially libelous. I'm going to look
over the category myself, but please please, anyone else who does so (or
already
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
To me the wording of the board resolution is clear as is stands. Erik has
further clarified it. However, present practice in Commons does not follow
it. So if these three words help make the intended meaning clearer,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
The resolution as worded requires that any photo of a person in a private
place, or with an expectation of privacy, carry a declaration of consent.
It does not specify consent to what, and there is no broadly agreed
On 5/13/13 2:58 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
there is no broadly agreed model of what that consent form might look
like.
Actually there is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
So images like this one would have to be deleted:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 5/13/13 2:58 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
there is no broadly agreed model of what that consent form might look
like.
Actually there is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
That looks better than I
On 5/13/13 5:03 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
So images like this one would have to be deleted:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Michelle_and_Barack_Obama_paint_at_a_Habitat_for_Humanity_site.jpg
That image should be tagged with {{consent|published}}, which
states the following:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Pete, that photograph is from The Official White House Photostream. This
rather implies that the subjects or their representatives waived their
reasonable expectation of privacy.
The cucumber lady, however, DID NOT, and
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
It merely states (paraphrasing) images of people in a private setting
OR
with an expectation of privacy.
The OR inserted above is important to the paraphrase -- it's one of the
things that often gets missed in
Also, I will say this out in the open.
What I wrote just previous to this is EXACTLY why we on Commons have
allowed ourselves to be guided by common sense and our community
drafted policies, rather the potentially destructive Board resolution.
I will also make it known that I sent emails to Sue
Right Pete,
It is an important distinction to make, thanks for that. For example
A person in the UK is having a meal in a restaurant. It's not exactly
a private setting is it? Do they have an expectation of privacy?
Read
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2013-May/thread.html
shows me that Topless image retention -don't give up has stretched on
pretty long, and it seems to me like it might be better suited to onwiki
discussion instead. Maybe the posters who are very interested in
engaging in that
I second your proposal.
On 5/13/2013 9:36 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2013-May/thread.html
shows me that Topless image retention -don't give up has stretched on
pretty long, and it seems to me like it might be better suited to onwiki
discussion
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
The cucumber ladies still have their pictures on Commons, even though the
Flickr account the images were scraped from has long been deleted:
(SFW:) http://www.flickr.com/photos/phoenixontherise/6092639951/
I've
17 matches
Mail list logo
