Sumana,
Yes, gladly. I feel that thread has served a good purpose, but it's true,
it's been at the expense of flooding the list with a lot of noise, and I've
contributed some of it. I do think that after a prolonged long dip into
less productive discussion, in the last exchange we have arrived at
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.comwrote:
Sumana,
Yes, gladly. I feel that thread has served a good purpose, but it's true,
it's been at the expense of flooding the list with a lot of noise, and I've
contributed some of it. I do think that after a prolonged
Awesome! I mean... Radical!
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/13/13 8:03 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
All the more reason why I love free knowledge and open sharing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Angela_Davis_enters_Royce_Hall_for_first_lecture_October_7_1969.jpg
An image of Angela Davis, never published
Sarah, 14/05/2013 08:46:
Hi Sumana and Pete, I would object to closing any thread down. If people
don't want to read the thread, that's fine, but if others are discussing
it, please allow that.
You can as well continue with private email.
A posting rate limit has also proved successful on
Hey Sarah et al
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is my first Commons deletion nom. I'm trying to act rather than
expecting others to do it, but it's not a particularly pleasant experience.
I understand why people don't want to get involved.
You
I agree with Sarah: the thread should stay, tagged with [Commons] as Erik
has suggested.
We are actually making progress – painful progress at times, but
significant progress nevertheless.
Andreas
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21
I'm not sure I see the pressing reason why this thread needs to go on-wiki.
Commons doesn't have a venue for discussing problems this fundamental with
it as far as I know, and people have spoken in this thread who either do
not or will not participate on-wiki on Commons. Moving the thread on-wiki
Hello!
Can you please tell me how to remove my email from this list. I originally
joined because I was interested in becoming a Wiki-woman! But I was in
denial over the amount of time I would've had to dedicate to the effort.
Thanks for your help.
Karen
Hi Karen! We hate to lose you, but I can understand that other things in
life may take precedence. Just log on to
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap and follow the
instructions for unsubscribing.
Just to throw out other ideas, take some time to check out alternate lists
at
(Correction: the first abstinence userbox reads This user practices
abstinence, not This user practices abstinence but still has a healthy
sex drive thank you very much.)
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Katherine Casey
fluffernutter.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that enwp has a *lot*
I wouldn't mind not seeing any of those userboxes on the projects,
but... userbox wars have wasted countless hours over the years. I was
tangentially involved in debates about the pedophilia/ephebophilia
boxes, the User supports Hamas (etc.) boxes and a few other debates,
and found that only the
Well, I haven't read ANY of the emails in the thread, for the petty reason
that the subject line makes me cringe every time I see it. And according to
my gmail count there's something like 100 mails on the topic, so I'm
probably not going to start now. So if indeed there is actual progress
being
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Sarah et al
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is my first Commons deletion nom. I'm trying to act rather
than
expecting others to do it, but it's not a
Phoebe, I would really suggest reading the emails if you're interested in
the discussion (or, conversely, not asking for a summary if you're not),
but here's a quick-and-dirty condensation off the top of my head:
I started the thread to discuss how disposition of topless photo of a woman
on
Straight but not narrow is not necessarily fetish/philia related: people
saying they are straight but not narrow often means they are straight but
support gay rights. But that's just a side issue.
I have a gay userbox/category on my user profile for a few reasons: because I
use it as a litmus
Hi
This news story is doing the rounds in the news but I don't know if
everyone has seen the original NY times op-ed by Angelina Jolie[1]. She
talks about her preemptive and precautionary double-mastectomy because she
found out she was at a higher risk for breast cancer after genetic
screening. I
Thanks. That helps a lot, really, and I will skim the emails now. I really
didn't know what the topic of this extensive discussion *was* before, and
didn't have the stomach for another protracted censorship discussion.
thanks again,
-- phoebe
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Katherine Casey
It would be nice if someone could make an analysis of the presence
depth (treatment, protocol, prevention) of articles on breast cancer
vs prostate cancer on Wiki(p/m)edia, as both are becoming about the
same threat in terms of live expectancy after diagnosis. We could work
from there on a to-do
18 matches
Mail list logo
