The litmus test is whether what they have said is not only 'offensive' but,
'grossly offensive'. Wikipedia's internal systems and thresholds would make
no difference to the authorities in the UK. It would be interesting to see
what the public fall-out would be if Wikipedia decided that no
Sydney, I agree completely. As a fellow female WIR, I'm happy to answer
questions and am always encouraging women to take on these positions! :)
-Emily
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Sydney Poore sydney.po...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the issues that faces anyone who tries to create Wikipedia
Hello,
I'm one of the new editor-in-chiefs of The Signpost, the community-written
newspaper covering the English Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.
While it is hosted on the English Wikipedia it is independent of the WMF.
In March, we would like to include some content focusing on women's
Marie I always find your replies so interesting. Glad you share.
On Jan 30, 2015 5:46 AM, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
There is something I thought I should mention as a UK member of this list.
Hate speech (including online) is illegal in the UK.
When the Bank of England announced
There is something I thought I should mention as a UK member of this list.
Hate speech (including online) is illegal in the UK.
When the Bank of England announced that Elizabeth Fry would be dropped from the
new £5 notes and replaced with Winston Churchill, it meant that there would be
no
