Re: [Gendergap] Commons Searches

2011-10-12 Thread Brandon Harris
*From:* Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org *To:* Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org *Sent:* Wednesday, 12 October 2011, 6:13 *Subject:* Re: [Gendergap] Mind the Gap Award is here

Re: [Gendergap] Mind the Gap Award is here.

2011-10-11 Thread Brandon Harris
://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Gendergap] Mind the Gap Award is here.

2011-10-11 Thread Brandon Harris
at the princely sum of $299.00!). ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org

Re: [Gendergap] Sue's new blog

2011-09-30 Thread Brandon Harris
___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

Re: [Gendergap] Black skins

2011-09-19 Thread Brandon Harris
On 9/19/11 4:26 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: Here is an example of Caucasian bias: the en:WP article on [[hair straightening]]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair_straightening Despite the fact that this is a topic of great practical interest to black women, many of whom either have

Re: [Gendergap] Wikifashion

2011-09-14 Thread Brandon Harris
On 9/14/11 8:41 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote: I really like the layout and such of the website I am on record in a number of places expressing my love for their skin design. I don't necessarily like the color scheme but the skin layout is top-notch.

Re: [Gendergap] Resolution:Images of identifiable people

2011-09-12 Thread Brandon Harris
On 9/12/11 3:58 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: I'm not sure if we're ready to move it to meta yet, I do wish we had a more private place to develop this. It's a rather sensitive topic for folks. Perhaps a google doc or...? To be honest, I think that working as publicly as possible is