I apologize Sarah. I thought that descriptions of the images would allow
those who cannot view them to evaluate the contents if they wish. It will
not happen again.
Nepenthe
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask that people don't
Presumably Sarah means Cindamusehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cindamuse
.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
I know women (Cristamuse, Slim Virgin, just to name two) who deal with
plenty of crap and *ARE NOT* admins.
Actually,
File:Ronda F7998.JPGhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ronda_F7998.JPGis
clearly in scope. Could be used to illustrate Urn, Vase,
Pottery,
Crosslegged etc.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
I will be of course posting a link to this list on the
categorized! (Is that really all it takes? Absurd.) And it could
be used to illustrate the article on Bagby Hot Springs!
Of the seven images Commons proposes to have illustrate encyclopedic
articles on Bagby Hot Springs, 3 are of nude women.
It's female nudes all the way down.
Nepenthe
On Wed, May
of our websites, then I'm not
really losing sleep over it unless personality rights are involved.
(Meaning naked photo of woman/man who doesn't know their naked photo is on
Commons under a free license.)
-Sarah
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Nepenthe topazbutter...@gmail.com wrote:
The more I
to suggest that
there's some sort of class gap on Wikipedia too? Utter tosh. I hope you
don't intend on editing any Wikipedia articles based on these ridiculous
assertions.
Nepenthe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2...@reagle.orgwrote:
On 04/30/2013 12:03 AM, Risker wrote
heavier whinging about how adminship is terrible idea
because they might block *him*, as if there's any chance of that.
Nepenthe
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
RANT START
If these people were behaving the way they do on other websites (i.e
I'm curious; which feminists are these? I've never encountered that line of
reasoning.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems we may be coming full circle, in that an increasing number of
feminist women are seeking to return to the sex-differentiated
Fred, as I've already noted, the offending comment was apparently
*not*eliminated from the final tally of the votes made by George
Chernilevsky,
though omitting it would not have changed the outcome of the vote.
Nepenthe
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote
I was all ready to point out that administrators (at least on en.wiki,
theoretically) discount comments like that, but that was *not* done in this
case per the closing summary.
Nepenthe
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36, Sarah
10 matches
Mail list logo
