On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
We are not talking about filtering standard sex education images as you
might find in a school book. We are talking about images or videos of women
(...)
Andreas
Maybe I'm just asking for it, but I just did some
We are not talking about filtering standard sex education images as you
might find in a school book. We are talking about images or videos of women
drinking their urine, masturbating with a toothbrush, or having sex with a
dog.
Andreas
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Michelle Gallaway
I think the point is taken.
I really have no desire to think about these things, especially every
time I read this mailing list these days.
-Sarah
On 6/2/12 7:57 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
We are not talking about filtering standard sex education images as
you might find in a school book. We
On 6/2/2012 12:15 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
I think the point is taken.
I really have no desire to think about these things, especially every
time I read this mailing list these days.
-Sarah
Really. My idea is, let the foundation use it's best judgement. I'm
sure it will err on the liberal
* Laura Hale wrote:
There was a real feeling amongst some people that this was a
red-herring type issue that was taking away valuable time and resources
from doing activities towards increasing female participation on Wikimedia
related projects, and that to a certain degree, the obsession with
From Larry Sanger's blog:
---o0o---
I want to start a conversation. [...Larry says, in his blog]
I. Problem? What problem?
So, you didn’t know that Wikipedia has a porn problem?
Let me say what I do not mean by “Wikipedia’s porn problem.” I do not mean
simply that Wikipedia has a lot of porn.
What is the relationship with gender-gap ? Are female children more
unlikely to contribute to Wikimedia projects if they saw some porn on
Wikipedia or Commons ?
Caroline
2012/5/30 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com
From Larry Sanger's blog:
---o0o---
I want to start a conversation.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Caroline Becker carobecke...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the relationship with gender-gap ? Are female children more
unlikely to contribute to Wikimedia projects if they saw some porn on
Wikipedia or Commons ?
Caroline
This was something we discussed at
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Caroline Becker
carobecke...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the relationship with gender-gap ? Are female children more
unlikely to contribute to Wikimedia projects if they saw some porn on
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For an example of a woman exasperated by Wikipedia's handling of sexual
content, see this
post http://www.junkland.net/2011/11/donkey-punch-or-how-i-tried-to-fight.html by
blogger Penny Sociologist, which my wife
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:46 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
That is, in my opinion, an actionable user behavior problem, even
without the gender related issues. Those clearly make it worse, of
course.
I will go look it up later, but it's probably too stale to do
The best way to make sure an image filter is never implemented on
Wikipedia is to have Larry Sanger endorse it :P
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/30/12 9:01 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
From Larry Sanger's blog:
---o0o---
I want to start a conversation. [...Larry says, in his blog]
I. Problem? What problem?
Hi all,
I am a new contributor to Wikipedia and read Larry's blog post and the
subsequent discussion on this list with great interest.
My first thought was that this indeed is a red herring in terms of addressing
the gendergap, however in my limited editing experience I do at times feel like
13 matches
Mail list logo
