Update, and a request:
The discussion thread John started has been very active, with I think about
30 posts from a wide variety of customer service (OTRS) volunteers.
Summary:
* Many people agree that there is an important concern about readers who
find personal/traumatic content about
I think we need to be clearer about who is the audience here. It seems
to be directed at the customer, rather than at Wikimedians, but then
some of the text is unnecessarily detailed and distracting. We have to
assume that most people are not actually reading pages like this for
comprehension,
I applied for Commons OTRS today...
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Sep 12, 2011, at 5:45 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like we have strong
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Several women, including on WikiProject Feminism on the English
Wikipedia, have recently expressed concern about the number of
photographs of women's body parts that Wikimedia hosts, particularly
regarding the issue of
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction
are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are
self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs. What
processes should we
Several women, including on WikiProject Feminism on the English
Wikipedia, have recently expressed concern about the number of
photographs of women's body parts that Wikimedia hosts, particularly
regarding the issue of permission.
It's far from clear in many cases that the women have given
Several women, including on WikiProject Feminism on the English
Wikipedia, have recently expressed concern about the number of
photographs of women's body parts that Wikimedia hosts, particularly
regarding the issue of permission.
It's far from clear in many cases that the women have given
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 21:00, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
The matter is discussed at Commons:Photographs of identifiable people
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people
Fred
Thanks for the link, Fred.
It seems that page
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 21:33, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think (after working in the fashion and photography private sector
for almost 10 years before non-profits) that model releases are as important
as OTRS copyright releases when it comes to sexual content on
If someone sees an image of themself which they want removed, they can
1. email OTRS.
whether the request is received by a volunteer and/or anonymous person
shouldn't matter. The OTRS policies do matter, esp. the privacy
policy.
For added privacy, they should email oversight-en-wp or the
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:22 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to throw this back in a positive direction. The task of
deleting poor quality photographs (and metadata/provenance/paperwork
is part of quality) is made much easier if we have good quality
photographs of
11 matches
Mail list logo
