Apologies for the formatting - the machine stripped the breaks that would
have made my post readable. G (I'm a workman blaming the tools ...) It
should have looked like this:
I’d like to agree with Daniel that “purgative rituals” should be added to
the repertoire of ways to deal with these
I also believe that ArbCom _could_ provide good solutions for these
situations, but the existing model isn't very scalable and doesn't work
for many cases. One potential solution would be for ArbCom to offer the
services of a prosecutor for certain cases, when the person bringing
the complaint
I hate to be overly simplistic but I find in these circumstances that IAR
applies.
Just be courteous to all users involved, even those accused of incivility,
and use the Socratic method. Question them about their actions in a way that
suggests that you are not taking sides (which as an
While I understand the frustrations in this thread, it does us no good
to resort to incivil behavior here, even regarding a person who is
[most likely] not part of this list. I respectfully ask that we
refrain from comments like By god, I hate that man.
Thank you,
LadyofShalott
P.S. I realize
Thanks Kaldari and Andreas, I appreciate the feedback!
--
Erin O'Rourke
http://erin-orourke.com
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
The use of the term collegial to describe the editing milieu. Anyone who has
spent much time in the academe will recognize a lot of the problem
behaviours we see on our own project, particularly personalization of
disputes, which is one of the major elements leading to the perception of
