Specifying a collation at the app-server doesn't fully solve the problem. If a
collation is the right tool for the job, it needs to be part of the index and
again as part of the query. It's important to understand the difference between
specifying a collation in a range index, in a FLWOR
So one reason to do this, in the example given, is that (hypothetically) a city
field in an address might have:
HOUSTON, houston, Houston, HOuston, etc.
Rather than using a computed field, you would use a case insensitive, maybe
whitespace and punctuation insensitive index, so
NEW YORK
NEW
So is there a way to create such case, whitespace and punctuation insensitive
index? I tried using http://marklogic.com/collation/S1 as Geert suggested and
that worked as far as capitalization goes (but it does not work e.g. for
whitespace – ‘Houston ‘ would still be a miss).
In addition, I
Hi,
Mark Logic search REST API by default returns 10 records per hit. We know that
there is an attribute called pageLength to return the no of results to which
it is set.
But we want to return all documents from MarkLogic database without knowing its
count. It's not recommended to get all
If you look in the Admin Interface on the screens where you create range
indexes, there is a collation builder there. That can help you. Using the
collation builder, it looks like this will be case and diacritic insensitive as
well as space insensitive:
Small addition to this:
MarkLogic 8 will be able to index GeoJSON as-is. MarkLogic 8 allows storing
JSON as JSON type documents, and then you can put a geospatial path index on
location-point/coordinates. I was able to run the following successfully on
MarkLogic 8, and get the JSON document
Hi Chris,
Does the response contain a Content-Length? If not, maybe MarkLogic waits the
full timeout before it decides there is none. If it has one (with a value of
zero), that might be a bug..
Kind regards,
Geert
From: Chris Hudson-Silver
Hi All,
Recently I was working on a project that tracks a repository by calling a REST
webservice that returns back metadata and download URLS for items that have
changed in the remote repository since the last call. It then checks to see if
the item has already been downloaded and if so will
Hi Gert,
Thanks for your reply.
I checked and the response did not have a content-length so I checked the HTTP
spec to see what the content-length should be set to for a 304 response.
The 304 response MUST NOT contain a message-body:
Hi Gary,
Very interesting response - thanks! Just one note:
For the XQuery update
facilities and is still a candidate recommendation,
I believe the XQuery Update Facility is already a full recommendation:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-update-10/
Joe
Hi, Gilles:
You could create a REST API resource service extension that supports the POST
method, accepting a document with the XQuery code, evaluating the XQuery code,
and returning an XML document.
Either the user will need the eval privilege or you'll need to add an amp to a
role with the
/attachments/20150108/3657ae29/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:43:33 +
From: Geert Josten geert.jos...@marklogic.com
Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] XDMP:http-get and 304 responses
To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion general
Hi,
I need to execute XQuery from a REST client app and retrieve results
as XML documents. I made a similar thing easily using exit-db back-end
but I'm somehow stuck to find the best practice with ML 7 to code the
same thing.
The pseudo-code (Python like) I made looks like this :
---
#
Hi Chris,
It is not uncommon to be strict in sending, tolerant in receiving with such
things. I would recommend sending your case to Support. The delay sounds
unnecessary, and inconvenient..
Kind regards,
Geert
From: Chris Hudson-Silver
Although not an ideal solution, but if it does end up being a bug that you
have to live with for now, then perhaps one way that will help with the
delay for the time being at the expense of extra round-trips:
- first do a head request using hdmp:http-head()
- locally decide on the need to
Hello,
Does MarkLogic has something similar to function index as exists in other
databases such as Oracle? For example, in Oracle one can create a function
index on a value of UPPER(field_name) as follows:
CREATE INDEX cities_fn_idx ON cities (UPPER(name));
which ensures that a query like the
Hi Alexei,
On the question whether MarkLogic allows indexing function results, then the
answer is unfortunately no. Such a feature is on the wish list of many of us.
The best alternative for upper-case would be using collations to ignore case,
for instance http://marklogic.com/collation//S1
As Geert indicates, there is no exactly comparable functionality in MarkLogic
today. You can think of the document—structure and values—as the API to the
indexes. Thus, if you want to index something it needs to be (mostly) explicit
in the document itself. (Word stemming is a counter example of
To expand on those answers by Justin and Geert:
I've played with this challenge a bit about a year ago and come to an
interesting solution that worked well enough for my needs:
- set up a trigger on update or insert
- analyze the doc to see if it matches your function (the code you are
using,
19 matches
Mail list logo
