Re: [DISCUSS] S2Graph Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > The proposal looks interesting. I'd love to help as a mentor but I can't > since I'm not an IPMC member. Hello Byung-Gon, You can certainly get involved and help out S2Graph with community, legal and other issues related

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Hi Taylor, I don't know the Spark community's opinion on the "outright vs subproject" issue, although I have told a couple people in that community about the proposal and have posted an FYI to the spark-dev list. From a technical perspective, Spark-Kernel mainly uses public Spark APIs (except for

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

One question about this from the Spark side: have you considered giving the project a different name so that it doesn't sound like a Spark component? Right now "Spark Kernel" may be confused with "Spark Core" and things like that. I don't see a lot of Apache TLPs with related names, though

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate REEF

The vote[0] for Apache REEF to become a top-level project has passed with 21 (5 binding) +1 votes, and no 0 or -1 votes. The binding +1 votes were from: * Jakob Homan * Chris Douglas * Ross Gardler * Hitesh Shah * Chriss Mattmann The non-binding +1 votes were from: * Markus Weimer

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > That kind of argument is totally out of line. The IPMC may decide to use > the model as a metric for podling compliance and so integrate it into > the Incubator policy[1]. Unless and until that happens, any attempt to >

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Thanks for the reference Alex. It answers my question regarding the path you chose. -Taylor > On Nov 13, 2015, at 12:13 AM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > > Hi, > > it looks pretty interesting, especially a part about integration with > Zeppelin as another Scala

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On 10.11.2015 16:00, Pierre Smits wrote: > That is nice! Apache pages drawn up by a member of the Apache Software > Foundation with the input from many (both ASF members and others) and > hosted/communicated through ASF means, and then saying that those 'are not > Foundation'. And that by/through

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > > In terms of whether to put this in Apache Spark proper, we can have a > discussion about it later, but my feeling is that it's not necessary. One > reason is that this only uses public APIs, and another is that

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > > I'd also like to second Matei that spark-kernel as a name is fairly > confusing. It only makes sense when viewing from IPython notebook's point > of view to refer to these things as kernels. Outside of that context, it >

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Recent example was the MySos proposal, it is MySQL in Mesos, which renamed to Cotton before officially entering incubator. I think it would be easier for infra if the name is decided a bit early to something that have better chance to pass incubation. - Henry On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

I'm happy to mentor the incubation if you are still looking for mentors. I'd also like to second Matei that spark-kernel as a name is fairly confusing. It only makes sense when viewing from IPython notebook's point of view to refer to these things as kernels. Outside of that context, it sounds

[VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Malhar 3.2.0-incubating release candidate. This is the first release of the Malhar library in ASF and it is based on Apex core 3.2.0-incubating. This is a source release. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Hi, > > it looks pretty interesting, especially a part about integration with > Zeppelin as another Scala interpreter implementation. > > AFAIK there was a discussion on including Spark-Kernel to spark core >

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

Hello, Brian, Thanks for collaborating with Nick and bringing this proposal to us! On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Brian Spector wrote: > Hi all, > > among cryptographers in the embedded / IoT space, the 'MIRACL' brand has a > lot of household name recognition. Most