Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Wang, Gang1 wrote: > +1 (no-binding) > > Best Regards > +Gary. > > -Original Message- > From: Cheng, Hao [mailto:hao.ch...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:09

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Yes i believe references to asf projects when needed is sufficient. Julien > On May 23, 2016, at 16:19, Henry Saputra wrote: > > I thought the concern had been addressed? > > For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but do > not have

RE: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (no-binding) Best Regards +Gary. -Original Message- From: Cheng, Hao [mailto:hao.ch...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:09 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator +1 -Original Message- From: Jacques

RE: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Jacques Nadeau [mailto:jacq...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:26 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept > > CarbonData into the

June 2016 - Incubator Report Timeline

June 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2016 Wed June 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun June 05 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun June 05 -- Summary due by end of day Tue June 07 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept > CarbonData into the Incubator. > > ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept > CarbonData into the Incubator. > > ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Do not

Re: Help with new ARIA TOSCA proposal

Hi Arthur, If you send over your wiki username I can grant you access to start putting up your proposal. John On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:57 PM Arthur Berezin wrote: > Sebastian, thanks for the kind introduction. > John and Jakob thank you so much for stepping up! As

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 Julian > On May 25, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept CarbonData > into the Incubator. > > ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Do

Re: Help with new ARIA TOSCA proposal

Sebastian, thanks for the kind introduction. John and Jakob thank you so much for stepping up! As Sebastian mentioned, we've been working for some time now preparing the code base we would like to be the starting point for ARIA as an Apache incubation project. I've tried to create a project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.1.2 (incubating)

LGPL is disallowed as category X: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x John On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:10 PM Michael Vorburger wrote: > Hello, > > This thread appears to mix LGPL (Hibernate) and GPL (nothing used in > Fineract AFAIK). They are not quite the

[VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept CarbonData into the Incubator. ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator [ ] +0 Abstain [ ] -1 Do not accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator, because ... This vote is open for 72 hours. The proposal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.1.2 (incubating)

Hello, This thread appears to mix LGPL (Hibernate) and GPL (nothing used in Fineract AFAIK). They are not quite the same of course. It seems like even LGPL really is a problem then? Just thought it would be worth to be precise here. Regards, Michael On Sun, 22 May 2016, 00:56 Justin Mclean,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Hi All, Trying to get this out, we have one +1 binding vote on general@ (from me), and need _2_ more votes. The release has passed the podling PMC unanimously -- please help us get this out, as we're approaching the end of the vote window (we may be past it.) This is the 4th release we're

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator... +1 -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+ 1 (non-binding) Regards, Sandeep On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: > +1 (binding) > Paul > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > - Tsuyoshi > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0-incubating released

The Apache CommonsRDF team is proud to announce the latest release of Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0. Apache BroCommons RDF aims to provide a common library for RDF 1.1 that could be implemented by systems on the Java Virtual Machine. More details can be found at https://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/

RE: [DISCUSS] Accept SensSoft into the Incubator

Hi Ted! DARPA XDATA is ending next March. We currently have support on another DARPA contract that is good through next year, excluding potential options. We also have some commercial contracts that will leverage these open source projects. Some of this funding can be used for community