Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We > have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community doesn't > work. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, but very hard to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:41 PM Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > On Jun 14, 2016 4:10 PM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote: > > > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.2.0 (incubating)

+1 binding. I checked the following: - hashes - gpg signature - builds from source - LICENSE file - NOTICE file - Source code headers - no stray binaries - release has incubating in version number - Drew On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:03 AM Darin Johnson wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, James Carman wrote: > That's what I figured. We could just go straight to TLP I suppose, if you > guys honestly don't think the Incubator would help. Is there any harm going > through the incubator? > No harm at all. It will increase

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

I'm happy to announce that the Apache Incubator has unanimously approved this release. There are 6 approving votes, all of which are binding: * Sergio Fernández * Jakob Homan * Julian Hyde * Justin Mclean * Jean-Baptiste Onofré * Seetharam Venkatesh There are no disapproving votes. We'll

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

This vote is now complete. We'll summarize the results and next steps in the [RESULT] thread. Thanks everyone! On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 (binding) > > + sigs look good > + LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good > + licenses in source and xml

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Jun 14, 2016 4:10 PM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote: > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the > Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

That's what I figured. We could just go straight to TLP I suppose, if you guys honestly don't think the Incubator would help. Is there any harm going through the incubator? I don't want to reignite the "straight to TLP" debate. We honestly need some help/advice getting more folks involved. There

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

I don't think that there is a good definition of empty. The smaller the initial community, the larger the effort to bootstrap is the observation, but we don't really have a magic rule to apply. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, James Carman wrote: > What do we

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

What do we consider "empty"? Is there some observed "critical mass"? Right now I believe we are 4 (to contribute), but they have had users for a long time. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Generally speaking, incubation is to nurture a community to

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We > have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community doesn't > work. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, but very hard to

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Generally speaking, incubation is to nurture a community to adopting the Apache Way. This includes self governance, community growth and licensing policies. We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck guys > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > > mentor

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the > Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the > Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

Binding vote D > On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > [ X ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

[VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the Apache Incubator. Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PirkProposal [ ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator [ ] +0 Abstain. [ ] -1 Do not

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:25 PM, James Carman wrote: > We (the Commons PMC) have not decided yet what to do, but I just wanted to > gauge the interest in joining the math IPMC if we choose to go TLP by way > of the incubator. The idea would be that math (whatever its

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of > the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they > didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them enough additional contributors. That made it seem like the project should go

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted to make Math a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved with Commons Math felt that a TLP at the ASF would not work for them, so they forked the project and left, effectively voiding the TLP vote since the proposed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.0 released

Hi J-D, I would like to get this started especially now that UPSERT and Spark SQL DataFrames support. But, how do I use Cloudera Manager to deploy it? Is there a parcel available yet? Is there a new CSD file to be downloaded? I currently have CM 5.7.0 installed. Thanks, Ben > On Jun 10,