+1 (binding)
Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, built using JDK 8
on Linux, ran apache-rat. Checked that source tar ball matches git at
08c75b55f7f97be869049cf80a0da5347e550a3d.
In binary artifacts, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER.
Julian
> On Nov
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:03 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> after a discussion with the Quickstep community:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E
> and a formal passing vote:
>
>
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No binary files in release
- There a few files with header issues (see below)
- Couldn’t compile but look like I have the wrong version of protobuf installed
Several files still have
+1. Did a build with a clean mvn repo, checked the DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and
LICENSE files. Found the RAT issues already noted by Josh. Getting these
fixed soon would be good as finding license issues is much harder by hand
then with RAT.
Alan.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:15 PM Josh Elser wrote:
+1 (binding)
a few comments below, checked:
filename
signature & hash
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE
build from src
no binary
src files have headers (see below)
comments, not blocker for release IMO:
1.
CREDITS file is a bit non-standard in an ASF release - this is generally
not included as it is
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- No binary files
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashed good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binary files
- all ASF source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
+1 (binding). Download and verify signatures. Sanity check over the
content inside zip file.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:25 AM Makoto Yui wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Hivemall community has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Hivemall v0.5.2 by v0.5.2-RC2.
>
> We now kindly request that
> Apache projects (and podlings) don't have project leads.
Let's say active podling PPMC member(s) instead.
Makoto
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Will there be an announcement when it's released?
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:10 PM Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> On 2018/11/23 17:36:27, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> > Thank you Justin and Ate for your votes. Now we are +2 binding, but I
> guess
> > I still need one more, right?
> > Anyone else willing
On 30/11/2018 06:04, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I think it's a great idea. Podling project leads know the up-to-date
> ASF incubation process very well.
Apache projects (and podlings) don't have project leads.
> It helps finding active mentors.
>
> As a release manager and PPMC of an
Hi all,
The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 [RC1] is closed, now.
Vote result:
5 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1, no 0 and no -1
Binding +1:
- Justin
- Luciano
- Jean-Baptiste
- Stefan
- Christofer
Non-Binding +1:
- Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Here is the voting thread:
12 matches
Mail list logo
