Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 Hongtao Gao Thomas Weise 于 2019年1月14日周一 上午6:34写道： > Hi all, > > Following the discussion of the Hudi proposal in [1], this is a vote > on accepting Hudi into the Apache Incubator, > per the ASF policy [2] and voting rules [3]. > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Akira 2019年1月15日(火) 10:25 Jakob Homan : > > +1 (binding) > > -Jakob > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:22 PM Mayank Bansal wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:11 PM Mohammad Islam > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > On Monday, January 14, 2019, 12:46:48 PM PST, Kenneth

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

Can someone outline the changes that happened and the approaches taken to resolve problems. Did we cleanup any uneeded code or did we just add all licenses for all source deps? On Mon, Jan 14, 2019, 3:43 PM HI, > > >> Justin - Zach's follow up is in this PR into 1.4 branch [1 > >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Jakob On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:22 PM Mayank Bansal wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:11 PM Mohammad Islam > wrote: > > > +1 > > On Monday, January 14, 2019, 12:46:48 PM PST, Kenneth Knowles < > > k...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:11 PM Mohammad Islam wrote: > +1 > On Monday, January 14, 2019, 12:46:48 PM PST, Kenneth Knowles < > k...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:38 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Monday, January 14, 2019, 12:46:48 PM PST, Kenneth Knowles wrote: +1 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:38 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

HI, >> Justin - Zach's follow up is in this PR into 1.4 branch [1 >> ], which includes all >> changes (another PR was already merged to master) Was there any changes to LICENSE that PR doesn’t include any making it hard to review. What was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

Hi, > Justin - Zach's follow up is in this PR into 1.4 branch [1 > ], which includes all > changes (another PR was already merged to master) If you’ve deal with the CC-SA licensing issue then the other issues were minor and could be fixed in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

Thanks Zach for jumping on this! Justin - Zach's follow up is in this PR into 1.4 branch [1 ], which includes all changes (another PR was already merged to master) Once you confirm changes look good, Steffen can restart the vote process.

Re: Incubator exit interview

Hi, Currently only a couple of people have access to the feedback directly, but my intent is for all the IPMC to have access. Anything that come up from the feedback will be brought back to the list and discussed. I’m just not sure how to arrange that, currently if any other IPMC members want

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Thank you! On 14.01.19 11:19, Matt Sicker wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Sebastian wrote: So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), than they could keep using the board? That's my

Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

Hi, I'm a bit late as it seems there is great mentorship on this project already, but I'd be interested in helping as a mentor, too, if it becomes useful. Kenn On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:20 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > I will start the VOTE in a day or two if there are no further comments. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:38 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following the discussion of the Hudi

Re: [IPMC] What to do with retired podling repositories

Hi Daniel Yes I'll be using Kibble so a great suggestion! Sounds like a win-win situation to me :-) Thanks Sharan On 2019/01/14 11:14:26, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 1/14/19 12:12 PM, Sharan F wrote: > > Hi Greg > > > > You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather > >

Re: Incubator exit interview

Hi All As Julian mentions, my understanding is that this is about information collection not about decision making. The more information we have that is relevant could encourage more focussed discussion and help us see if there is something unclear in the documentation or process. If there is

Re: Incubator exit interview

What Roman said. And also, I make a distinction between communication (information gathering) and decision making. The Apache Way is that decisions occur on-list. It doesn’t say that all communication/information gathering is on-list. Julian > On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Roman Shaposhnik

Re: Incubator exit interview

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 1/14/2019 1:01 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > I don’t think the “decisions should be made on-list” principle applies to > > all communication. (Otherwise why would we allow hallway conversations at > > conferences?) I’d rather that we

Re: Incubator exit interview

On 1/14/2019 1:01 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > I don’t think the “decisions should be made on-list” principle applies to all > communication. (Otherwise why would we allow hallway conversations at > conferences?) I’d rather that we make better decisions than be slave to > principle. > It really

Re: Incubator exit interview

I don’t think the “decisions should be made on-list” principle applies to all communication. (Otherwise why would we allow hallway conversations at conferences?) I’d rather that we make better decisions than be slave to principle. These interviews would be in addition to on-list surveys.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following the discussion of the Hudi proposal in [1], this is a vote > > on accepting Hudi into the Apache Incubator, > > per the

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Sebastian wrote: > So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the > discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), > than they could keep using the board? That's my understanding. It applied to the ASF Slack, for

Re: Incubator exit interview

Isn't that starting off on the wrong foot? off list communication, non-transparancy, treating the VP of the PMC as "more" than an administrative position, etc... > On Dec 22, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Another idea is for Justin (or someone else active in the IPMC) to > have

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist), than they could keep using the board? Best, Sebastian On 14.01.19 01:14, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Jan 13, 2019, at 10:09 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion of the Hudi proposal in [1], this is a vote > on accepting Hudi into the Apache Incubator, > per the ASF policy [2] and voting rules [3]. > > A vote for accepting a new Apache

Re: Edit Permissions for Incubator Wiki

Thank you very much for the prompt response. It works. I'll add the proposal this week. On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:04 PM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:54 AM Lars Francke > wrote: > > ...The user name is "LarsFrancke".. > > you should now

Re: [IPMC] What to do with retired podling repositories

On 1/14/19 12:12 PM, Sharan F wrote: Hi Greg You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather than an IPMC one) so if delete is the consensus,  then go for it. I won't hold it up. If you are doing research on them, and you are (presumably) using Kibble there, you could

Re: [IPMC] What to do with retired podling repositories

Hi Greg You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather than an IPMC one) so if delete is the consensus, then go for it. I won't hold it up. Thanks Sharan On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 11:25 Greg Stein If they didn't graduate, then they aren't Apache projects. So as Myrle >

Re: Edit Permissions for Incubator Wiki

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:54 AM Lars Francke wrote: > ...The user name is "LarsFrancke".. you should now have access to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [IPMC] What to do with retired podling repositories

If they didn't graduate, then they aren't Apache projects. So as Myrle says, "what are they doing on our servers?" For the retired podlings, our copy of their code could be misleading, relative to where it came from, or where the community may have newly forked it. Not an Infra opinion, -g On

Edit Permissions for Incubator Wiki

Hi, I'd like to add the proposal for the Apache Training project. Could you please grant me edit permissions for the Incubator Wiki? The user name is "LarsFrancke". Thank you, Lars