RE: Podling reports due Wednesday

HI Justin and Felix, I have just put my sign off. Yes, you are right. I am not sure where its going. I only see 1 or 2 members in lists that to very rarely. I feel it is still far away to come to graduation. I also don’t see any releases from long time. This project's PPMC is not active.

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

Hi, > I don’t mind taking on as a mentor for Spot but it seems the volume of > interaction (commits, dev@) has gone down significantly in the last 6-9 > months? If you read their report they need to revive the community. I have also noticed the lack of activity. It may be they find it hard to

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

I don’t mind taking on as a mentor for Spot but it seems the volume of interaction (commits, dev@) has gone down significantly in the last 6-9 months? On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:21 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently we’re missing only one sign off and that is for: > Spot > > Which, I

Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

Justin Mclean wrote on 06/10/2019 06:08:34 PM: > > > 1. CI/CD. We have automation (Jenkins/TravisCI) that automatically > > publishes images to dockerhub from the master branch of many of our git > > repos. These images are all tagged with git commit hash style tags. The > > 'latest' tag is

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

Hi, Currently we’re missing only one sign off and that is for: Spot Which, I forgot to mention in my last list. This is one podling that needs more mentors, is anyone available to help? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

Hi, > We tried very hard to only use min-headers in cases where they were > config/property/test/simple script type files (often used by tooling). Which according to [1] is not an appropriate use, you also have source files with the short header. I suggest you check with legal if this is OK.

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

Hi, > 1. CI/CD. We have automation (Jenkins/TravisCI) that automatically > publishes images to dockerhub from the master branch of many of our git > repos. These images are all tagged with git commit hash style tags. The > 'latest' tag is always an alias to the most recent of these CI/CD tags.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

Hi - The ASF expects that PMCs will watch out for their project and product brands. The VP, Brand and their committee are available to help with advice and also trademark registrations via the tradema...@apache.org mailing list. My only concern with the README.md files in some Github project

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

Justin Mclean wrote on 06/09/2019 09:37:47 AM: > > Hopefully someone else can provide some insight with what going on > with docker. I can try :) The project's usage pattern has evolved during incubation. Here's what I think OpenWhisk is currently doing with dockerhub. 1. CI/CD. We have

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project

For my part (and OBO IBM), have gone out of my way to transfer worldwide trademarks (and domain names, including openwhisk,org) to the ASF working with our IP and legal teams and caused a complete product rename as we entered Incubation. There is no intentional use of OpenWhisk, any that

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

The content of a release and the downstream limitations on field of use are not a matter of legal shield. It has always been the case that the fundamental promise of Apache has been that Apache software is easy and safe to adopt and use. Easy and safe meaning that you won't have nasty surprises

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

Hi Justin, Given the documented rationale of where we use the mini-header (https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md#project-asf-License-header-policy) are there specific files (types) or specific files themselves where you believe they are

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

Colleagues, Podling report for DLab has been submitted. Probably it awaiting mentors review. Thanks. DMYTRO LIASKOVSKYI Software Engineering Manager Office: +380 322 424 642 x 57729Cell: +380 97 341 1315Email: dmytro_liaskovs...@epam.com Lviv, Ukraine epam.com

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

Justin Mclean wrote on 06/09/2019 09:50:12 AM: > > Sorry to be clearer re the short header issue I suggest you read > [1]. It may be used with mages, minified JavaScript or PDFs, that’s > not the case where it’s been used in your releases and this has been > pointed out several times. If there

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

Agreed... isn't the whole point of the Incubator is to provide not only training and guidance but also a "safe place" where these codlings can learn the ropes, including How To Do A Release? And don't we stress that such podlings are under incubation is to ensure (as much as we can) that those

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

Hi, > Ted and Roy (in other threads) seem to have said that Ted's bucket #1 is the > only thing that is a true showstopper. And other board members have said said at various points that peddling release must follow release and distribution policy, and legal VP has said that podling releases

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

Hi, >> It’s a pity that the people who are strongly for this position, don’t seem >> to actually want to be involved in helping out, but just want to discuss >> and tell the people actually doing the work are going the wrong way about >> this. :-) >> > > Dude. Totally out of bounds. Please

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:15 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It’s a pity that the people who are strongly for this position, don’t seem > to actually want to be involved in helping out, but just want to discuss > and tell the people actually doing the work are going the wrong way about >