Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 07/11/2019 20:00, Dominik Riemer wrote: > Hi all, > > following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes > (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1cf79ef65888f695b4b925fd67ef8a2b845f6b0931c251a0ff1115e1@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E), > I would like to call a VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

+1 (binding) Checks Done: - hashes and signature is okay - incubating in name - ASF heades in relevant files - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER exists Regards Asif On 2019/11/06 17:54:57, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me (binding). > > I checked: > - Incubating

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards Asif On 2019/11/07 21:52:24, Joe Witt wrote: > +1(binding) > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Kevin Ratnasekera > wrote: > > > +1 ( binding ) > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > > > On Thu,

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

So, what's the step? 1. Call a normal Apache Vote 2. Build the App and upload to App Store with ASF's Apple Developer Account using the code in step 1 Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 Greg Stein 于2019年11月8日周五 上午8:57写道： > We're trying to do better on what services are available, so

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

We're trying to do better on what services are available, so consider this "step one" :-) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:19 PM Julian Feinauer wrote: > Thanks Greg, I didn't know that! > > Julian > > Am 07.11.19, 19:24 schrieb "Greg Stein" : > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 ( binding ) > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:00 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > > > [X ] +1, bring StreamPipes into the Incubator..

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 ( binding ) On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:00 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > > [X ] +1, bring StreamPipes into the Incubator.. > > With 5 mentors for 5 initial committers you should be well taken care of > ;-)

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:00 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > [X ] +1, bring StreamPipes into the Incubator.. With 5 mentors for 5 initial committers you should be well taken care of ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 Great project! On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:40 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > A big +1 (binding) from me > > Chris > > Von: Julian Feinauer > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 20:19:43 > An: general@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

Hi, +1, good lucks! Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI 7 Kas 2019 Per, saat 22:40 tarihinde Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de> şunu yazdı: > A big +1 (binding) from me > > Chris > > Von: Julian Feinauer > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 20:19:43 >

AW: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

A big +1 (binding) from me Chris Von: Julian Feinauer Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 20:19:43 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator Hi Dominik, I like StreamPipes, as you know, thus my vote is

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

Hi Dominik, I like StreamPipes, as you know, thus my vote is +1 (binding) Julian Am 07.11.19, 20:00 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi all, following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Thanks Greg, I didn't know that! Julian Am 07.11.19, 19:24 schrieb "Greg Stein" : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Distribution+via+the+Apple+App+Store On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:14 PM Greg Stein wrote: > An app signed by the Foundation is most

[VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1cf79ef65888f695b4b925fd67ef8a2b845f6b0931c251a0ff1115e1@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E), I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Distribution+via+the+Apple+App+Store On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:14 PM Greg Stein wrote: > An app signed by the Foundation is most definitely associated with the > ASF. The Foundation has an Apple Developer Account for exactly this reason. > > >

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

An app signed by the Foundation is most definitely associated with the ASF. The Foundation has an Apple Developer Account for exactly this reason. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:17 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > A binary convenance release needs to be created from released voted on > code. [1] >

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Hi, A binary convenance release needs to be created from released voted on code. [1] However if some 3rd party (not the PPMC) wants to use unreleased code and make a “release” from it and put that somewhere but it needs to be clear that this is not in anyway associated with the ASF and it

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Hi, I think this cannot be done as PMC or PPMC as it would be a "binary release" which we cannot do with the ASF policy. So I think another entity than the ASF / the PMC would need to put the App in the store, and then you are also free with regards to releases. Julian Am 07.11.19, 14:34

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Releasing an Apache project (artifact) requires community oversight. The released artifact going to an FTP server, Maven central. or other location is a separate concern. The website describing the projects, its news, etc is less of an artifact - more of a living document about the community. At

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

I am OK with the normal release procedure if we have to. But I'd like to know the boundary line here, why we don't need go though the release procedure for Apache Project Website and why we need it for an App built from Apache code. What's the difference here? Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 Jamie

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

The App should follow a release process - vetting, vote, signatures, tag on source repository, etc. The community should approve its release. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:29 AM 申远 wrote: > > Hi, there > > I'd like to know whether it's necessary to do an Apache Release if we > publish an App to

[DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Hi, there I'd like to know whether it's necessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store using the code of Apache Weex [1]. I understand there is no need to do an Apache Release if we publish projects website, but what if we publish an App to iOS Apple Store? [1]

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi Anatole, first, congratulations, nicely done (took some stamina to over several RCs...)! Second, little commnt, the binding votes where from IPMC not PPMC : ) Julian Am 07.11.19, 12:04 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : Thank you all vor voting. I will close this vote with a YES result:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Thank you all vor voting. I will close this vote with a YES result: Thank you for voting! 5 binding +1 votes (PPMC): Julian Feinauer Justin Mclean Jean-Baptiste Onofré Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Furkan KAMACI no non-binding +1 votes no -1 votes Have a nice day, Anatole -- *Anatole Tresch* PPMC