Justin,
This is all excellent news. Thank you for the support.
> I as the V.P Incubator would be willing to sign that.
I've drafted a note. I'm still learning the culture: shall I send it to the
list or directly to you?
> Thanks for your email. The Incubator welcomes any research done
Inline
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 9:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I concur with Greg. There are two types of IPMC members who are not
>> subscribed to private@. Those who are Apache Members who can always ask to
>> rejoin and others who were voted onto the IPMC
Hi,
> I concur with Greg. There are two types of IPMC members who are not
> subscribed to private@. Those who are Apache Members who can always ask to
> rejoin and others who were voted onto the IPMC would need to be added again -
> let’s limit mistakes with the second group. [1]
There's 6
Hi Craig,
As the PPMC of Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating), i would like to share our
experience of community growing. Hope it could provide some help to you. :-)
## The data of our community growing
As i summarized in our dev@list [1], we made a great improvement of community
growing last
I've done a bit of evangelism on this topic:
https://blogs.apache.org/comdev/entry/an-approach-to-community-building
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3409SA-QpdE (Apache@Google summit. You were
there, but here's a vid)
My favorite highlights (maybe from the above but not sure if I said it
Hi -
I concur with Greg. There are two types of IPMC members who are not subscribed
to private@. Those who are Apache Members who can always ask to rejoin and
others who were voted onto the IPMC would need to be added again - let’s limit
mistakes with the second group. [1]
I would suggest
Hi,
> IMO, involuntary mailing list subscription is not the right choice. …
Thanks for your opinion, I’ll consider what to do some more.
> Putting them onto a mailing list could anger them (think about it: would you
> be
> happy, if I subscribed you to (say) priv...@tomee.apache.org?).
If I
IMO, involuntary mailing list subscription is not the right choice. ...
Just take your list of AWOL non-responders to the Board, and ask if there
are any objections to placing them on a "removal" resolution for the
February meeting. The Board may provide some guidance/steps to take. Or
they may
Welcome back to China.
I had talking to lots of apache contributor from China. Build local
community is the part of hard, So I suggest: before HUAWEI conference ,
collecting the problem from local apache project contributor, community
manager, PMC etc. e.g. local meetup is good choice.
Hi
> About the missing license for the font, we've already investigated a bit on
> this, below is the conclusion. In this release I would like to leave as it
> is.
As these fronts are binary files and don’t have an license header it could
confuse people who use your software to what their
Thanks Justin for the reply.
About the missing license for the font, we've already investigated a bit on
this, below is the conclusion. In this release I would like to leave as it
is.
Based on https://www.glyphicons.com/license/ we do not need to directly
> mention the licensing for those fonts.
Hi,
I'm working on a presentation to the Huawei Developer Conference in Shenzhen
February 11 on the subject of "Growing Communities The Apache Way".
I'd like to share with the audience some stories of Apache Projects that have
grown their communities, either in the incubator or after becoming
Hi,
> There is another (perhaps more obvious) solution and that is to sign these
> people up to the mailing list.
I’ve not had any feedback on this, so unless someone else has some input, I’m
going to assign lazy consensus applies and this is what I’m going to do:
1. Subscribe all missing
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing a license
- NOTICE incorrect states "2018 and onwards” please fix
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- unable to compile from source bu assume it
Dear Apache enthusiast,
(You’re receiving this message because you are subscribed to one or more
project mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.)
The call for presentations for ApacheCon North America 2020 is now open
at https://apachecon.com/acna2020/cfp
ApacheCon will be held at
Hi,
The vote passes with 20 binding +1 votes and 10 non-binding +1 votes
and no other votes.
+1 (binding)
*Felix Cheung*
*Craig Russell*
*Furkan KAMACI*
*Michael Wall*
*Sheng Wu*
*Kevin Ratnasekera*
*Dave Meikle*
*Byung-Gon Chun*
*Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
*Justin Mclean*
16 matches
Mail list logo
