+1 binding, good luck
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Konstantin Boudnik 于2020年2月10日周一 上午5:54写道：
> Hello.
>
> As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would
> like
> to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
>
Hi,
The report has been submitted and incubator report wiki page made read only. If
you need to make any last minute changes before the board meeting please use
whimsey. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2020-02-19/Incubator
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards,
Swapnil M Mane,
www.apache.org
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:24 AM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would
> like
> to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator.
>
>
Hi,
+1 (binding) A nice improvement on the previous release
There is as noted in the disclaimer several issues with this release, use with
caution.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists (work in progress) version
- LICENSE looks good (didn’t do a an exhaustive check)
- NOTICE
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- disclaimer exits
- NOTICE year is incorrect, please fix
- LICENSE is OK
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
How many of your mentors voted on this release?
Thanks,
justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:04 PM John D. Ament wrote:
>
> CCLAs simply tell us that a company is aware that their employees are
> contributing to ASF projects. They don't really help much in the way of
> getting code transitioned here.
>
> I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code
CCLAs simply tell us that a company is aware that their employees are
contributing to ASF projects. They don't really help much in the way of
getting code transitioned here.
I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was relicensed,
removing IBM specific headers. If the code
Let me try to rephrase that:
The project has been done by Thomas Watson who has an iCLA, works for
IBM, and is a Felix PMC. I was assuming that would be enough to have
him be able to contribute this code. If we think we want something
more like a specific SGA or CCLA from IBM than I can try to
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Thomas Watson is from IBM and should be covered by their CCLA and has
> > an iCLA on file.
>
> Nope a CCLA is not a blanket permission to donate this code if it is
> copyright IBM.
I think we've been here before - so what would
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:09 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm not sure how that follows - which code is EPL?
>
> Several pieces of code in the repo still have headers that claim IBM is the
> copyright holder and under EPL license.
I can't see any code - there are only some profiles
Hi,
> I'm not sure how that follows - which code is EPL?
Several pieces of code in the repo still have headers that claim IBM is the
copyright holder and under EPL license.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
> Thomas Watson is from IBM and should be covered by their CCLA and has
> an iCLA on file.
Nope a CCLA is not a blanket permission to donate this code if it is copyright
IBM.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:49 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> BTW if the code in general is not from IBM then it contains code that is and
> is licensed EPL, that can’t be included in an ASF source release so I would
> be -1 on those grounds.
I'm not sure how that follows - which code is
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:42 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 until the following is cleared up.
>
> I can see that until a month ago it was under the EPL license. Did all of the
> contributors agree to the license change?
The main contributor is Thomas Watson (who did the change) - there
Hi,
BTW if the code in general is not from IBM then it contains code that is and is
licensed EPL, that can’t be included in an ASF source release so I would be -1
on those grounds.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
-1 until the following is cleared up.
I can see that until a month ago it was under the EPL license. Did all of the
contributors agree to the license change?
It also seems that the code was copyright is IBM. Have they given permission
for this software to be donated or license headers
Hi @justin,
Many script files used same license header like
"docker/hoodie/hadoop/base/entrypoint.sh" did.
Could you tell me how to correct it? Thanks.
Best
Lamber-Ken
On 2020/01/29 02:49:18, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures
The Apache Felix project has received an "Atomos" contribution from
Thomas Watson.
Atomos is a Java module framework using OSGi Connect which is a
proposal (RFC) for the upcoming OSGI R8 Core specification.
- A snapshot of the code, that is already ALv2, is available in a
github repo: [0]
- The
19 matches
Mail list logo
