Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc4

2020-02-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
+1 (binding) — Leif > On Feb 10, 2020, at 2:31 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache PageSpeed (Incubating) version > 1.14.36.1. > > The Apache PageSpeed community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release > Apache PageSpeed

Re: [Consultation]About trademark registration of a project

2020-02-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks for your questions. It not a requirement that all projects have their names trademarked. You can see the full list here [1] and you note that not every project is listed. If there are any trademarks with the project name they would need to be transferred to the ASF when the project

[Consultation]About trademark registration of a project

2020-02-12 Thread zhangguochen
Hi, all, We are China Telecom Corporation Limited Cloud Computing Branch Corporation. We hope to contribute one of our projects​ name 'HBlock' to Apache. Now we are in the process to get into the incubation steps. At present, 'HBlock' is not registered as a registered trademark in any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc4

2020-02-12 Thread Jukka Zitting
[x] +1 approve mod-pagespeed-incubating-1.14.36.1-r0.tar.bz2: 9001DCED 8688E634 8FC48AE8 55EE22AE 0B97BFB2 4BC26255 EDDB8AFB BCD4D314 018442C7 F936A079 86FE8F0F 7CE1569E 39230293 60E7BEE7 C7950333 9AE1315F Double-checked the improvements made earlier in https://s.apache.org/1tbs4 and

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Atomos Codebase

2020-02-12 Thread John D. Ament
+1 from me On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM Karl Pauls wrote: > > > I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was > relicensed, > > > removing IBM specific headers. If the code never had IBM licensing on > it, > > > this would be a very easy +1 but because of the relicensing,

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Atomos Codebase

2020-02-12 Thread Karl Pauls
> > I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was relicensed, > > removing IBM specific headers. If the code never had IBM licensing on it, > > this would be a very easy +1 but because of the relicensing, it's a -1 from > > me until we get an SGA from IBM. > > I'll talk with Tom

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc2

2020-02-12 Thread Przemysław Trędak
Hi Justin, No mentor voted on this RC, we had 1 mentor vote on the previous RC (RC1). Thanks, Przemyslaw On 2020/02/12 02:46:40, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > How many of your mentors voted on this release? > > Thanks, > justin > >

[VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-12 Thread tan zhongyi
Hi, guys, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache brpc (incubating) 0.9.7-rc03 (it goes to vote in incubator mail list at last.) BTW: there is still some license issues to be fixed, so we add DISCLAIMER-WIP there, we will fix them in later releases. Apache brpc

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

2020-02-12 Thread Cihad Guzel
+1 (non binding) Cihad Guzel Konstantin Boudnik , 12 Şub 2020 Çar, 12:50 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > +1 (binding) > > On 2/9/20 4:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Hello. > > > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I > would like > > to call a VOTE to accept this

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

2020-02-12 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 (binding) On 2/9/20 4:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Hello. As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would like to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

2020-02-12 Thread Kevin Ratnasekera
+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 binding, good luck > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > Konstantin Boudnik 于2020年2月10日周一 上午5:54写道: > > > Hello. > > > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I > would > > like > > to call a