Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Not sure what legally needs to be checked, but a quick search on uspto.gov did not return any result of the single word 'rainbow':

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

Hi, > We are about at the 72hr mark, but only one person from the IPMC has > reviewed and voted. We need two more to be able to close it out. 72 hours in a minimum not a maximum. I suggest you ask and encourage your other mentors to vote. Thanks, Justin

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0

Hi all Thanks for reviewing and voting for Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0 release, I am happy to announce the release voting has passed with 3 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1 votes. Binding votes are from IPMC - Felix Cheung - Jason Lowe - Justin Mclean The voting thread is:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0

Hi all Thanks for voting for this release. I have created YUNIKORN-112 to track the issues found in this release. Now the voting is passed and we can close this, I will send a result notice shortly. Thank you for the review!! Weiwei On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.0.0 [RC1]

Hey all, We are about at the 72hr mark, but only one person from the IPMC has reviewed and voted. We need two more to be able to close it out. This is our first release under Apache and we would appreciate your review. Thanks, Brennan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Hi, > - I had trouble compiling from source as it required a new version of cradle > than I had on my machine but is incompatible with the latest version of > cradle (7.0) Thanks autocorrect - obviously I meant gradle :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Hi, +1(binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE is fine but may mention code that is no longer bundled? (e.g mvn) - NOTICE year needs updating - NOTICE content are not correct. There is a number of ALv2 bt of code bundles and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

Hi, > *files*. They are not compiled source code of any language. They are not > executable. We used the extension ".bin" to indicate that they are binary > files and not human readable. No but they are easily confused as binary file. I'd suggest renting them ".dat” rather than “.bin”. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

John, Thank you for your vote. With respect to the src/test/resources/*.bin files: As I stated earlier in this thread: Those bin files are not compiled source code but are representative binary > output images of sketch data structures that fall into one of 2 cases: > >- Sketch images

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

For anyone that would like to vote on this release that is unfamiliar with Iceberg, here are the community’s recommended checks: 1. Download the source tarball, signature (.asc), and checksum (.sha512) from

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

Hi everyone, I propose the following candidate to be released as the official Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating release. The Iceberg PPMC vote passed with 12 +1 votes, 7

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc5 (respin)

Hi, +1 from me. I checked: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK - NOTICE is OK (year should be updated at next release) - No unexpected binary files (except for the mentioned ones) - Checked PGP signatures - Checked Checksums I could not compile the code. It could be fine

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PageSpeed 1.14.36.1-rc5 (respin)

[x] +1 approve Best, Jukka On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:06 AM Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > This is a new call for vote to release Apache PageSpeed (Incubating) > version > 1.14.36.1: the other thread was accidentally send as html, and > contained a bad link which > pointed towards the previous

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi all, We have conducted a name search for 'Rainbow'. We feel that although there are few existing open source projects with this name, they are in a different space, hence not necessarily restrict us from using it. Please advise how we should progress. Following the results we have found: I.