Thanks all for your votes, we already 3 binding +1 and 1 non-binding +1,
I'm going to close the vote and prepare for the release.
Best regards,
Saisai
Jean-Baptiste Onofre 于2021年2月10日周三 下午12:48写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Quickly check name, signature, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
> Regards
>
Hi,
> The reference [2] refers to the three different licenses for the three
> different products. There are three links to three different license pages.
>
> https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-oslicense.html
>
The reference [2] refers to the three different licenses for the three
different products. There are three links to three different license pages.
https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-oslicense.html
https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-jeoslicense.html
Hi,
> Berkeley DB uses a Category X non-commercial license, which Justin points out
> is not an open source license.
>
> Berkeley DB Java Edition uses a standard Apache License, v2.0 with an
> additional license that appears to be the 3-clause BSD license for an
> embedded third-party
Craig,
As Justin pointed out, while the "Java Edition" includes the AL 2.0
license, there are additional restrictions on the website [1]:
"The our open source license permits you to use Berkeley DB, Berkeley DB
Java Edition or Berkeley DB XML at no charge under the condition that if
you use the
Which Oracle product is TubeMQ dependent on?
From what I see, there are two distinct Oracle products, with different
licenses:
Berkeley DB uses a Category X non-commercial license, which Justin points out
is not an open source license.
Berkeley DB Java Edition uses a standard Apache License,
Thank you for the clarification, Justin! I missed that non-commercial
limitation.
I agree that it would be better to replace that dependency,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:41 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My concern is that while it claims it is under the Apache license that is
> only for
Hi,
My concern is that while it claims it is under the Apache license that is only
for non-commercial use. Having a restriction like that means it’s not really
under the Apache license.
It states on that page [1]
"Our open source license is OSI-certified and permits use of Berkeley DB in
Starting Wednesday ci-builds.apache.org has experienced issues which are being
resolved.
Until they are clutch and website builds for the Incubator are broken.
I will kick them off once the builds configurations are restored.
Regards,
Dave
Can you be clear on what you mean by "has no standard license file" and "no
open source code channel"?
I started at this download page [1].
On that page near the top is a link to "more details" on licensing, which
points to [2].
The link there for "Open source license for Berkeley DB Java
Hi all:
We carefully analyzed the dependency package berkeleydb-je. I think
what @Justin
Mclean said is correct: it has no standard
license file, no open source code channel, and cannot be downloaded from
the central repository. All off all , It does have a problem.
I will restore the WIP
+1 (binding).
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 6:50 PM lidong dai wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I'd like to start an
> official VOTE thread now.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to
+1 (non-binding). Good luck!
Best Regards,
Yu
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 13:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 14 févr. 2021 à 11:49, lidong dai a écrit :
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I'd like to start
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
