Thanks for your clarifications.
Regarding "Apache" = "Quality", I'd be careful. Apache asserts [1] a maxim of
"Community over code". While certainly a broad community inevitably leads to
better code, and Apache is a good starting point, given the specificity of your
request I might start
Daniel,
Thank you for your reply.
> Can you clarify what you mean by an "Apache Java project"?
I would prefer to examine a project that has a formal release process and
an active community. So a TLP or incubating project would be great. In
this case I was equating "Apache" = "Quality" :)
It is unclear the guidance on this but since it is impossible remove from
maven
https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;classname~Pinot
Once it is published, I’d suggest we update all the links and git hash and
still proceed to vote on this. If there is any issue we should vote on
another
Moving this discussion to dev@bluemarlin
General@incubator on bcc
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 5:37 PM, Xun Hu wrote:
>
> Hi, Dave and Craig,
>
> I did not remember we ran RAT on the code.
>
> @Jean-Baptiste Onofré, correct me if it is not correct.
>
> Thanks,
> -xun
>
>
>
Hi, Dave and Craig,
I did not remember we ran RAT on the code.
@Jean-Baptiste Onofré, correct me if it is not correct.
Thanks,
-xun
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 5:34 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin
Hi Craig,
You are listed as one of their mentors, so ...
Also it appears that no one on the PPMC aside from Sheng Wu is subscribed to
the private list.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 5:18 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just one observation which might be
Hi,
Just one observation which might be useful.
The usual case for a large project being brought in is to leave the existing
copyright headers in place and then change them once the code is in the Apache
repository. Then it is a bit easier to see which files were being donated with
a grant
Can you clarify what you mean by an "Apache Java project"?
- A TLP?
- An incubating project?
- A project anywhere that is released under the Apache license?
There's actually no need to "migrate code" in many cases, just add some
files. Is there a particular use case you are interested in?
On
Folks,
Is anyone aware of an Apache Java project that has actually migrated their
code from Java 8 to the Java Platform Module System (JPMS)?
Thanks,
Lee.
Apologies for the mistake. We have done multiple releases until now and
this is the first time we missed the step to get the approval from IPMC was
missed before making the release.
What is the right thing to do at this point? Should we cut another release
or can we go ahead with this and ensure
Thanks for the votes. We appreciate the help from the community. This vote is
now only one binding vote short from passing.
For the notice dates for TVM, since we haven't updated the TVM dependency in
2021 yet, the version of TVM's notice we included still says 2020. In this
case, should we
Unfortunately this isn’t the right process for a podling release.
As the mentor, I am sorry to see the release is not up to the standard
upheld by previous releases.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:02 AM kezhenxu94@apache
wrote:
> I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it
Hi Atri,
I have sent the notice to Apache Board. Once the notice period ( 72 Hours )
is over, I will add you to the IPMC roster.
Regards
Kevin
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:23 PM Atri Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the way of introducing a new project proposal to Incubator and
> championing it
Hi,
I am in the way of introducing a new project proposal to Incubator and
championing it and as a step towards the process, would request addition to
IPMC.
Please oblige.
Regards,
Atri
I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it didn’t get
the approvals from IPMC but was released actually (in both dist.a.o and GitHub).
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for vote
Hi kezhenxu94:
I understood, thanks for you reply!
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
在 2021-03-17 21:41:06，"kezhenxu94@apache" 写道：
>You have to include a DISCLAIMER file in the release because Doris is still in
>incubator.
>
>If you have license issues,
You have to include a DISCLAIMER file in the release because Doris is still in
incubator.
If you have license issues, you can have DISCLAIMER-WIP so that IPMC members
won’t -1 when voting a release (WIP indicates that you’re resolving the
problem), but if you have resolved the license issues,
Oh, I see.
We will add DISCLAIMER back and modify the year in NOTICE.
This VOTE will be cancelled soon.
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
在 2021-03-17 21:22:47，"陈明雨" 写道：
>Hi Juan, Williem and Zhiyuan:
>
>
>Thank for your review.
>
>
>
>But why do we still
Hi Juan, Williem and Zhiyuan:
Thank for your review.
But why do we still need to keep DISCLAIMER-WIP in the code base?
We had some LICENSE issues in version 0.12, so we declared these issues in
DISCLAIMER-WIP.
These license issues have been resolved in version 0.13, so we have removed
Thank you all for your votes !
It is really excisting to release the first Liminal version under the
Apache Incubation umbrella.
Regards,
Lior
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:21 AM Zhiyuan Ju wrote:
> +1
>
> And it would better have some descriptions about this project :)
>
> Justin Mclean
Hi,
Please recheck links :)
kezhenxu94@apache 于2021年3月17日 周三上午10:23写道：
> Hey, most of the links in this email are invalid (404) [1], it seems
> because you have moved the candidate into the release directory [2]
> already, which should be done after incubator votes’ result (this thread).
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
