HI,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- no unexpected binary files in the releases
- all ASF files have ASF headers
- didn’t compile
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signature OK
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER is there
- ASF headers on files
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
Thanks,
Regards
JB
> Le 22 mai 2021 à 22:17, Jia Yu a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
>
>
It seems to me that knowing who has carryover votes is not important for a lazy
consensus vote.
The +1 votes are not really required except in the rare case they might be
needed to counter a -1; in which case I'd suggest intentional action following
the -1 would make more sense than saying "oh
> On May 22, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means the
>> VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.))
>
> IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to
Hi,
> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means the
> VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.))
IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to be
clearly stated in the vote email sent to the IPMC general list.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 6:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Was this vote open 72 hours?
>>
>> If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started on May 13.
>
> It needs to be 72 hours on the incubator list as well.
I think that IPMC votes of
The scala configuration file [1] appears to be a copy from [2] or its github
source at [3].
[1] ./examples/sql/src/test/resources/scalastyle_config.xml
[2] http://www.scalastyle.org/scalastyle_config.xml
[3]
Deepest apologies. Please disregard. (Minecraft is fixed, anyone asks).
> On May 22, 2021, at 5:07 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
>
> Antoine Toulme
> Founder | The Machine Consultancy LLC
> https://themachine.io
> anto...@themachine.io
> Phone: +1 (408) 471 6784
>
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 6:30 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been
>> junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
>
> Contest was which list it was sent to I’m sure your email client
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER (WIP) exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary file
- ASF files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
I would be interesting to know where this file come from [1] and I'd be
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine (you might want to consider unsing sha 512)
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- year in NOTICE is incorrect, please fix (this is also incorrect in the
README.md)
- files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary
Hi,
> Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been
> junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
Contest was which list it was sent to I’m sure your email client shows that.
Justin
-
To
Hi,
>> Was this vote open 72 hours?
>
> If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started on May 13.
It needs to be 72 hours on the incubator list as well.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been junking
emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find.
Justin many people have asked you not to cut so much context in your replies.
Do you understand why Justin?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Daniel
Antoine Toulme
Founder | The Machine Consultancy LLC
https://themachine.io
anto...@themachine.io
Phone: +1 (408) 471 6784
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
> On May 22, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> PPMC vote has already provided a required majority approval and hence this
>> vote is a lazy consensus vote open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Was this vote open 72 hours?
If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It
1. Calvin Kirs's vote was non-binding.
2. The only two binding votes were carried over from the PPMC. Seems the main
purpose of posting on this list is to get review from IPMC members who have not
yet seen it.
3. As Justin pointed out, 72 hours haven't passed, giving IPMC members other
than
HI,
> PPMC vote has already provided a required majority approval and hence this
> vote is a lazy consensus vote open for 72 hours.
Was this vote open 72 hours?
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1 (binding) carry over from dev@
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:17 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
>
> Sedona community vote thread:
>
>
Dear all,
I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
Sedona community vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra5f27cd5c9c3608205220c5d12a141c64681b7a5962785ce80fa73ec%40%3Cdev.sedona.apache.org%3E
Sedona community vote result thread:
Hi,
The vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5 has
passed with 3 +1 binding votes.
[3] +1 Binding votes:
- Paul King
- Furkan KAMACI
- Calvin Kirs
[ 0 ] +0 Binding votes
[ 0 ] -1 Binding votes
The vote is successful.
Thank you to the above IPMC members for taking
Hi,
The vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5 has passed with 3 +1
binding votes.
[4] +1 Binding votes:
- Paul King
- Furkan KAMACI
- Juan Pan
[ 0 ] +0 Binding votes
[ 0 ] -1 Binding votes
The vote is successful.
Thank you to the above IPMC members for taking the time to review
+1 non-binding
I checked:
Download links are valid.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are fine.
All files have license headers if necessary.
The year of NOTICE has not been updated, it is best to modify it in the
next version.
Paul King
+1 binding from me, carrying over my vote
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:29 AM Aaron Radzinski
wrote:
> Hello all,
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client
> (incubating) version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a
> natural language interface to any
Hi,
+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
I checked:
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
- Apache rat checks are OK
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 3:52 PM
Hi,
+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
I checked:
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 4:29 AM Aaron Radzinski
wrote:
>
+1 carrying forward my dev vote after the license/notice tweaks
I don't think there is an issue with the license of the file mentioned,
just the appropriate changes to the license/notice wording to ensure the
licensing condition is properly understandable. And I think some other
tweaks to
27 matches
Mail list logo
