Hi Pinot community
Glad and congrats you made this.
I did a review of your discussion thread, but I can't find the
decision process about PMC and V.P. candidates.
Could you share more context about this?
I can see you have a diversity committer list, should they be
considered as a PMC member
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
> Le 11 juin 2021 à 17:57, Felix Cheung a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:18 AM Xun Liu wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community
>> is also very active.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Xun Liu
>>
>> On Fri, Jun
Hi,’
Perhaps this will help: A software grant / initial donation consists of a set
of files, their 3rd party headers will be replaced with ASF ones and that noted
in the NOTICE file. If any other files 3rd party files, were then copied into
the same ASF repo they should retain their original
Hi,
> Well Justin, these files are typically generated by our software. It would
> not be OK to force the license into all files since that wouldn't be
> appropriate and right since we don't force Apache copyright on the work of
> others.
The ASF header doesn’t include a copyright line and the
Hi,
> It wasn't part of the software grant so we were just following the bundling
> apache licensed 2.0 code route as explained here [1].
See [1] "However, for completeness it is useful to list the products and their
versions, as is done for products under other licenses.” Common practice is
Hi,
The vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.8.0 has passed with
3 +1 binding votes.
[2] +1 Non-binding votes:
- Xun Liu
- Chao Zhang
[3] +1 Binding votes:
- Paul King
- Furkan KAMACI
- Juan Pan
[ 0 ] +0 Binding votes
[ 0 ] -1 Binding votes
The vote was successful.
Thank you to
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:42 AM Mayank Shrivastava wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After a discussion with the community [1], voting [2], and a positive vote
> result [3],
>
> we believe Apache Pinot (Incubating) is ready for graduation to a TLP,
>
> and we'd like to bring it up in
+1
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:18 AM Xun Liu wrote:
> +1
> Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community
> is also very active.
>
> Best regards
> Xun Liu
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:16 PM Xun Liu wrote:
>
> > Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base,
Hi Justin,
It wasn't part of the software grant so we were just following the bundling
apache licensed 2.0 code route as explained here [1].
No addition to the LICENSE was needed as the code already was Apache 2
licensed. As the necessary mentions already are in our notice file, no
change was
Well Justin, these files are typically generated by our software. It would
not be OK to force the license into all files since that wouldn't be
appropriate and right since we don't force Apache copyright on the work of
others. Without that possibility we're down to manually editing the files
Hello Chris,
Just before I responded about STEP geometry.
Another potential application is about assembly structures. Today likely all
reasonable CAD systems can generate STEP files with assembly information. SST
can already import XML files with assemblies (but not yet p21 files with
Hello Nathan,
Right, STEP geometry is one of the things we could do with SST. We are just
finishing with a higher level ontology that is directly derived from STEP
geometry models (written in the Express modelling language) and that is
directly integrated in SST as "early binding". So an
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:39 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi Lothar,
>
> after a call with you and comparing that to the proposal, I think it
> would be great if you could explain a little bit more on a concrete
> example what SST does, which problem it solves and how it differs from
> existing
Hi,
> We see integration tests as an even more important and integral part of the
> source code compared to unit tests since they offer so much more value in
> ensuring that functionality and compatibility remain the same when we push
> our software forward.
So in that case they should have ASF
HI,
> That file should be switched to the standard ASF header and is part of the
> original code and covered by the notice file.
Except it wasn’t in the previous release and I assume wasn’t part of the
original software grant.
Thanks,
Justin
+1
Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community
is also very active.
Best regards
Xun Liu
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:16 PM Xun Liu wrote:
> Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community
> is also very active.
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at
Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community
is also very active.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:29 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On Jun 10, 2021, at 7:12 PM, Mayank Shrivastava
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After a discussion with the community [1],
Hi Lothar,
after a call with you and comparing that to the proposal, I think it
would be great if you could explain a little bit more on a concrete
example what SST does, which problem it solves and how it differs from
existing solutions.
For me at first the proposal was pretty lengthy but
+1 (binding)
> On Jun 10, 2021, at 7:12 PM, Mayank Shrivastava wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After a discussion with the community [1], voting [2], and a positive vote
> result [3],
> we believe Apache Pinot (Incubating) is ready for graduation to a TLP,
> and we'd like to bring it up in discussion
We see integration tests as an even more important and integral part of the
source code compared to unit tests since they offer so much more value in
ensuring that functionality and compatibility remain the same when we push
our software forward. It gives us the freedom to continue progressing in
Hi Justin,
That file should be switched to the standard ASF header and is part of the
original code and covered by the notice file.
As for the no header in hpl and hwf files, these are files created using
the application and are used for samples and for our integration testing
framework. This
Hi,
-1 (binding)
This 3rd party file [1] is not mentioned in LICENSE. While this is just one
file my concern is that that this may indicate a bigger issue where headers of
3rd party files have been changed.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hash are fine
- LICENSE is missing a
Hello everyone,
It's been 12 days since this discussion started on May 31, 2021. After June
6, there are no more new questions arising. So I'd like to summarize the
results of this discussion so we can move forward.
Thank you very much to everyone at the Apache IPMC for suggesting changes
to our
Forwarding my PPMC vote
+1 (binding)
Good job to all the Hop team!
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 09/06/2021 à 10:47, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> This will be our preview 1.0 release, this release contains both the source
> code and binary to run the client. This will
24 matches
Mail list logo
