Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

Yes, the java client code has not been donated to ASF yet, as I mentioned above. The migration is expected to be done during incubation. Justin Mclean 于2021年6月22日周二 下午1:41写道： > Hi, > > I’m not talking about the web site repo I’m talking about the code for the > Pegasus Java client [1] that is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

Hi, I’m not talking about the web site repo I’m talking about the code for the Pegasus Java client [1] that is linked to from the front page. This particular issue is probably not a backer for this release but it would IMO be something that may stop the project from graduating. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

> > Why is this being developed outside of the ASF? > Pegasus website is developed by this repo[1], we will fix these issues later, and the website's code isn't inclueded in this release source package. I‘m not sure if it is a blocker for this release? 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

Hi, Looking at the people involved there seems to be some overlap. Why is this being developed outside of the ASF? Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

Hi, >> The hover text on the star icon still references https:// htts:// >> github.com/XiaoMi/pegasus, consider also changing it? >> > > Does the start icon matter? I thought only the releases matter. Yes it matters, you are linking to a non ASF product from the front page of an ASF site. [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

> > The hover text on the star icon still references https:// htts:// > github.com/XiaoMi/pegasus, consider also changing it? > Does the start icon matter? I thought only the releases matter. 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2021年6月22日周二 上午10:06写道： > The hover text on the star icon still references https://

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

If there are no more concerns, I'd start the voting process. Best Regards, Mayank On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:33 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Thanks for your continued support, Justin. > > We have fixed the broken download page for prior releases to point to the > archives [1]. We have also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

The hover text on the star icon still references https:// htts:// github.com/XiaoMi/pegasus, consider also changing it? Yingchun Lai 于2021年6月22日周二 上午9:56写道： > > > > I did actually. ASF release policy requires releases to be distributed > via > > dist.Apache.org . This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

> > I did actually. ASF release policy requires releases to be distributed via > dist.Apache.org . This doesn’t matter if it’s on > the downloads page or the > landing page. You should not be distributing via GitHub > > Until that’s resolved here’s my -1 > Hi, John It has

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

All, Sander has confirmed sending the signed software grants PDF but I don't see it. Does the PMC list filter emails with attachments? Any PMC able to see his email? Regards. On Mon, 21 Jun, 2021, 5:42 pm Rohit Yadav, wrote: > Justin - yes all top 5 major contributors have agreed for it per >

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Hi, > Justin - yes all top 5 major contributors have agreed for it per > https://github.com/svanharmelen/terraform-provider-cloudstack/graphs/contributors. Looking at who has contributed the project I think it needs a little more than those five and I’m not 100% sure who those five are. Have

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Justin - yes all top 5 major contributors have agreed for it per https://github.com/svanharmelen/terraform-provider-cloudstack/graphs/contributors. The repository was transferred by Hashicorp to the main/original author Sander, it's not donated/transferred to the project yet. Paul - thanks for

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]Accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator

Congrats, good luck! Best Regards --- DolphinScheduler PMC chair Lidong Dai lidong...@apache.org --- On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:23 PM Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi， > > Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote[1]. The voting is now > closed > and it has passed with

RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

@Rohit Yadav I can do it as a Member or Gabriel can do it as an officer. As per the IP clearance page you reference, do you have the software grant ready to go? “A software grant must be provided to the ASF. This grant can either be done by the ASF Corporate

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Hi, > As the next step, I was advised by ASF legal and others in the list to > follow the IP clearance process for accepting the codebase. I've already > been in touch with Sander who currently has got the repository transferred > by Hashicorp

IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

All, We're in the process of accepting the Terraform provider codebase under ACS PMC. The ACS PMC has already accepted the initiative and a vote on the same has already passed: https://markmail.org/message/g4prb25g7wakbifa As the next step, I was advised by ASF legal and others in the list to

[RESULT][VOTE]Accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator

Hi， Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote[1]. The voting is now closed and it has passed with 13 binding +1 , 8 nonbinding +1 and no 0 or -1 votes. Jean-Baptiste Onofre (binding) Kevin Ratnasekera (binding) Sheng Wu (binding) Duo Zhang (binding) Jeff Zhang (binding) Zhenxu Ke (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

> I was checking your vote on your dev list. It lists 4 binding votes, but I > can't find the listed voters on the Incubator PMC. For reference, only > IPMC votes are binding for releases, regardless of list they are voted on > (see [1] for reference). > > Did any of your mentors review this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc3

Hi Justin, We only used a small part of the code (sql parsing) in that repository, and that code has been removed. A discussion[1] was started to replace the code that was removed with a new implementation. [1]: