Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, The story is a bit different. I started, maintained and build most of both these code bases. And as far as I know I'm (still) legally both the author and the owner of the IP as the company I work for (for the last 12 years) has a chapter in their contract that states that any open

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
A, I just now see your message Rohit (it got in my spambox). But yes, I think the mail I've send just now is pretty much inline with your explanation in this mail... Sander On 23 Jun 2021, at 07:30, Rohit Yadav wrote:  My understanding is the plugin was originally started as a repo or work

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
My understanding is the plugin was originally started as a repo or work by Sander ( https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commits/master?after=5e7ccfea50810303a6b205084fb6f0b3eade33ca+314=master) who contributed it to the Hashicorp Github org like many other community providers

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Justin why do we need Hashicorp? They are not involved or are the owner of > the codebase/repos. My understanding was the work was carried out in their repo and that they are probably the IP owner of the codebase. Is that correct? Also, currently [1] redirects to [2], I can see they

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc3

2021-06-22 Thread Atri Sharma
-1 I see some files without a license -- please correct that. On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:21 AM Serge Panev wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release > candidate 3. > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
Justin why do we need Hashicorp? They are not involved or are the owner of the codebase/repos. Regards. On Wed, 23 Jun, 2021, 4:56 am Justin Mclean, wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I know this is the situation. If anyone has any information to > add please do so. > - We have no CCLA or grant from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc3

2021-06-22 Thread kezhenxu94@apache
Hi, my +1 binding only due to DISCLAIMER-WIP - SIL Open Font License is included in source tar [1]. - Some files are not listed in LICENSE [2]. - Some files are not recognized as ASF license header nor listed in LICENSE, hence I’m not sure what they are licensed [3]. [1]

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, As far as I know this is the situation. If anyone has any information to add please do so. - We have no CCLA or grant from Hashicorp, who probably own the IP. It would be nice to have clarity on who actually does own the IP. - We have one ICLA from a major contributor who has also filled in

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, I'm sorry, I just hit "reply-all" as I have no idea what's a private list and what's not. But I'll stop mailing... Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 17:08, Sander van Harmelen wrote: But we are constantly discussing that particular repo right? It's the aothet one that was just added.

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
But we are constantly discussing that particular repo right? It's the aothet one that was just added. Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 16:05, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, > The license didn’t change for the other repo. It has always been Apache > License, Version 2. Not sure if that matters? The

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

2021-06-22 Thread Mayank Shrivastava
Dear Incubator Community, We have discussed Apache Pinot Podling graduation in the general@incubator DISCUSS thread [1], and addressed all the questions and concerns brought up in the thread. Please refer to [1] for details on the questions and concerns brought up, as well as their resolutions.

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
Many thanks Dave for replying. Justin - thanks for replying. I think Dave has answered most of the questions. The reason this thread is copied to both ACS PMC and general@ is because this was intended as a starting point for ACS PMC and it was not clear to me how the IP clearance process works.

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - This IPMC member is finding this whole discussion circular. I’m including this link [1] from the discussion on legal-discuss@ which did include replies from other contributors. [1]

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please stop mixing public and private lists. Feel free to forward any email to the relevant private list but don’t mix them as it's very easy for something that should only appear on a private list to become public. > The codebases are under Sander's control who also was the original/main

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
Justin, On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:22 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > 3. Paul to update and commit the IP clearance: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.xml > > and send an email to general@incubator (/cc to >

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > The license didn’t change for the other repo. It has always been Apache > License, Version 2. Not sure if that matters? The license for that repo I mentioned has changed in the last couple of days, it was originally Mozilla Public License Version 2.0. [1] Yes this matters as the Mozilla

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, The license didn’t change for the other repo. It has always been Apache License, Version 2. Not sure if that matters? Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, Again I request that you please don’t mix private and public channels. IMO More than just a SGA is

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > 3. Paul to update and commit the IP clearance: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.xml > and send an email to general@incubator (/cc to > priv...@cloudstack.apache.org) prefixed [IP CLEARANCE] asking for clearance > to

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Again I request that you please don’t mix private and public channels. IMO More than just a SGA is needed here, there are several major contributors that AFAIK they have not been contacted and there are unanswered questions about this IP clearance/donation. Originally only one repo was

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
Paul, ACS PMC /cc general@incubator, Sander, (attempt #2 - the previous email was dropped due to larger grants PDF attachment size) Following the process described on IP clearance [1], we've received acknowledgement Sander's ICLA and since you're volunteering I've committed the outline XML here

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

2021-06-22 Thread Yingchun Lai
I've removed these links from the front page, you can refresh your browser to check the latest version. Thanks, Yingchun Lai Justin Mclean 于2021年6月22日周二 下午1:42写道: > Hi, > > I’m not talking about the web site repo I’m talking about the code for the > Pegasus Java client [1] that is linked to