Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.3.0-RC2

2021-11-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) because of WIP disclaimer I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP) - signatures and hashes are fine - NOTICE looks OK but given the large number of ALv2 code included I would expect some of them to have NOTICE files - From a quick quick LICENSE is missing some

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (Incubating) 0.6.0 Release

2021-11-20 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, The NOICE file has this: Apache AGE (incubating) Copyright 2019-2020 Bitnine Co., Ltd. Copyright 2020-2021 The Apache Software Foundation Which I don’t think is really correct. Bitnine Co., Ltd. did have copyright but that gave the ASF a grant right? And that original project wouldn’t have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.1.1-incubating-rc1

2021-11-20 Thread Xun Liu
Hi, Jia Yu +1 (binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - All links are valid - All ASF files have ASF headers - Can compile from source `mvn clean install` in addition: (1) In your incubator’s voting email,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC6

2021-11-20 Thread Xun Liu
+1 (binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - All links are valid - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers - Can compile from source on Mac Big Sur 11.6 `mvn clean install` - Checksums and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.1.1-incubating-rc1

2021-11-20 Thread sebb
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 03:14, Jia Yu wrote: > > Thank you Sebb. I will fix the KEY link on our website! Actually, I was referring to the way the KEYS link is referred to in VOTE emails etc, though of course it is important to use the correct one on the website as well. > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at