[Cancel][VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread 陈明雨
Dear IPMC, I will cancel this vote due to some NOTICE file issue mentions in thread[1] [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/y2plp5gwl2cpk54jb4g2myfn91s6q7yt -- 此致!Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org

Re:Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread 陈明雨
Hi JB, Thanks for your review. But due to Kris's comment, we need to add the NOTICE file for the binary package. So I will cancel this vote. -- 此致!Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org 在 2022-04-02 12:14:52,"Jean-Baptiste Onofré" 写道: >+1 (binding) > >I checked: >-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.0-incubating-rc1

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
hi, It should be noted, that the dev email vote should list your checklist, otherwise, the community vote will be meaningless. The purpose of the dev vote is to guide the community to learn the relevant process. Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2022年4月2日周六 12:16写道: > > -1 (binding) > > Two main reasons: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.0-incubating-rc1

2022-04-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-1 (binding) Two main reasons: 1. The NOTICE file looks incomplete to me 2. I'm not able to verify signature (GPG doesn't find the key, and I don't find KEYS file to import it) Regards JB On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:47 PM Paweł Kociński wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for vote on Apache

Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name - LICENSE and NOTICE (maybe update the year to 2022 there) files are there and look good - DISCLAIMER is there - ASF header is present in code source - hash and signature look good Thanks, Regards JB On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:00 AM 陈明雨 wrote:

Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Hi, I add some comments in PR, Another suggestion is that the release-note should not be in the form of a Github issue, because it can be modified. The common practice is to include a release-note file in the released package. 陈明雨 于2022年4月2日周六 10:08写道: > > Hi Kris, > Thanks for your review. >

[VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC5

2022-04-01 Thread Luciano Resende
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating (RC5) which brings support for Spark 3.0. The podling dev vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.apache.org/msg00112.html And the result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.apache.org/msg00123.html Tag:

Re:Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread 陈明雨
Hi Kris, Thanks for your review. Indeed I missed the NOTICE file for binary release. The NOTICE.txt you have seen is just for source release. For binary package, I have added new NOTICE for it, please help to review: https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/8813 And if that is OK, I will

Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Calvin Kirs 于2022年4月1日周五 22:57写道: > > Hi, > + 0 (binding) > I only checked source packages. > > - incubating in the name > - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good > - hash and signature look good > > I have some questions about binary packages, which is why I chose +0. > > I checked

Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Hi, + 0 (binding) I only checked source packages. - incubating in the name - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good - hash and signature look good I have some questions about binary packages, which is why I chose +0. I checked the corresponding binary package, but the dependencies