Hi,
It looks like some of the previous trademark/branding issues that have been
raised (around a year ago) still need to be resolved. What is the status with
this?
For instance:
https://cloud-tencent-com.translate.goog/product/cdwdoris?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp
HI,
One other issue is trademark ownership, previously it been stated that Baidu
owns the Doris trademark in China. Have this trademark been transferred to the
ASF? [1][2]
Kind Regards,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#incubator
2.
Hi,
> 2. I didn't find ASF branding issue on this site[2]. Could you help to point
> out?
There are several issues but in general this is not being followed [1] So in
short use of trademark symbol and missing trademark disclaimer,
Kind Regards,
Justin
1.
Hi,
> Could the ASF Foundation Legal Department have **more effective** support
> on trademark issues?
I’m not sure that the project has involved trademarks to provide support. I
certainly found a few things that I was unaware of and that had not been
mentioned in the project reports.
> As
Congrats!
On 13 May 2022 Fri at 23:22 Jasper Blues wrote:
> Congrats all!
>
> > On May 14, 2022, at 5:24 AM, joe fagan wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations on this stage in the process. Well deserved
> >
> > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 14:39, e...@apache.org wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Apache Incubator
Congrats all!
> On May 14, 2022, at 5:24 AM, joe fagan wrote:
>
> Congratulations on this stage in the process. Well deserved
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 14:39, e...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>>
>> The IPMC vote for graduating Apache AGE (Incubating) as a
Congratulations on this stage in the process. Well deserved
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 14:39, e...@apache.org wrote:
> Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>
> The IPMC vote for graduating Apache AGE (Incubating) as a TLP has passed.
>
> There are 23 (+1) and no 0 or -1 votes. The results are:
>
>
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your check.
1. Looks like this repo has been deleted sometime today. So I think this is
resolved.
2. I didn't find ASF branding issue on this site[2]. Could you help to point
out?
[1] https://github.com/DorisDB
[2] https://www.starrocks.com/en-US/index
--
此致！Best
Dear Apache Incubator Community,
The IPMC vote for graduating Apache AGE (Incubating) as a TLP has passed.
There are 23 (+1) and no 0 or -1 votes. The results are:
Binding(7)
*Furkan KAMACI
*Willem Jiang
*Jean-Baptiste Onofré
*Felix Cheung
*Byung-Gon Chun
*Kevin Ratnasekera
*Juan Pan
Thank you all for participating in the vote, we are closing the vote now and
will announce the results shortly.
On 2022/05/08 23:34:20 Eya Badal wrote:
> Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>
> Having passed the Community Graduation Vote [1] by the AGE community with a
> vote result to graduate
Yeah,
I know that it will not propagate instantly. I just noticed that I generally
would have added a comment to very many podlings about this and it should be
easily fixable by adjusting the question.
And of course ... doesn't have to be that wording ... just generally say which
information
Hi Justin
I also find that other projects also have this issue such as spark[1] ,
flink[2] and so on.
Is it necessary to start a new thread email to discuss this?
Looking forward to your further reply.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/lib/py4j-0.10.9.5-src.zip
[2]
> About branding issue
We have tried to communicate and resolve trademark issues regarding DorisDB
and Doris [1], but it seems that there are still some residual
issues.[2][3] As Doris' PMC I will continue to actively try to address
these issues.
Could the ASF Foundation Legal Department have
Hi,
>> I confirmed in the py4j-0.10.7-src.zip file, and the backport.py file
>> clearly states that it is all licensed under the PSF License.
>>
>> So can it be considered that py4j-0.10.7-src.zip is licensed under
>> BDS license, except that backport.py is under PSF license
I would double
>
> Hi Justin
>
> I confirmed in the py4j-0.10.7-src.zip file, and the backport.py file
> clearly states that it is all licensed under the PSF License.
>
> So can it be considered that py4j-0.10.7-src.zip is licensed under
> BDS license, except that backport.py is under PSF license
>
> In this
Hi,
I've brought up the StarRocks header license issue on the legal discuss mailing
list, to see what can be done about it.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Hi,
> 2. LICENSE is missing license from files in this zip It’s looks like
> they are under the PSF License not the BSD license.
> The license of the file py4j-0.10.7-src.zip does specify the BSD
> license on their official website [1]
> We specify py4j-0.10.7-src.zip in the LICENSE file under
Hi,
It’s easy enough to change the headings, we would need to regenerate the
pre-generated reports but’s that’s not a big deal.
The first change seems fine to me, for the second we might what to come up with
something shorter.
Note that when we have tweaked the titles in the past, it tends to
Hi all,
Just some things where I have been thinking of adding comments for
clarification to the incubator report. Perhaps we could in general make this a
bit simpler by tweaking the topics:
### Date of last release:
### Date and version of last release:
### When were the last
Hi Justin
Thanks for the checking and guidances. I'd cancel this vote here, will
re-initiate a vote after solved the problems you indicated.
Thanks again for helping Linkis become a better, more Apache Way compliant
project :)
Regarding the issue you mentioned, we will make the following
Hi,
I think there may still be some issues around DorisDB [1] and StarRocks,
although these might not be a graduation issues.
For instance StarRocks claims it’s "Free and Open Software” but it actually
under the Elastic License 2.0.
There are some minor ASF branding/trademark issues on their
21 matches
Mail list logo
