Thanks for your guidance, we have done a lot of repairs, and we are ready
to release v0.15.0-rc5.
Felix Cheung 于2023年1月31日周二 04:44写道：
> As I understand you can release under the WIP disclaimer
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:31 AM Zikuan An wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your valuable suggestion.
>
Hello Incubator Community,
I'm cancelling this vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/f266jk6o4lym5k0pwl951jt6pqy35bqo
due to licenses issues. I'll fix them and start a new vote process.
Thanks a lot for all your help.
Best,
Huajie Wang
Hi Justin:
Thanks for your answer, this vote is closed, we will fix them and start a
new vote process
Best,
Huajie Wang
Justin Mclean 于2023年2月1日周三 07:33写道：
> HI,
>
> > Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included
> in
> > binary license file ( /LICENSE), right?
>
HI,
> Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included in
> binary license file ( /LICENSE), right?
Just a note it’s not all dependancies that need to be listed but only what is
included in the release see [1]
Kind Regards,
Justin
1.
HI,
> Thank you for your answer. There is another question I would like to ask, is
> it necessary to copy the source code of the 3rd party library of the apache
> license, in addition to keeping the header, do we need to make additional
> declarations in our notices file?
It depends if the
Ah yeah, sorry I missed that part, I searched npmjs and found no result so I
thought the front end licenses are missing, didn’t notice you used the GitHub
address of the dependency. Then only 2 issues need resolved.
> On Jan 31, 2023, at 23:43, Huajie Wang wrote:
>
> hi kezhenxu:
>
>
>>
hi kezhenxu:
> All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary
license file
I checked again, All frontend dependencies' licenses are already included
in the binary license file[1] (all of them after line 732)
[1]
hi kezhenxu:
Thanks for your review and feedback. about frontend dependencies' licenses
, I have some questions
> All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary
license file
Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included in
binary license file (
Hi, it's better you should send a [CANCEL][VOTE] email for the previous
unsuccessful vote,
and start a new round of vote with subject [VOTE][ROUND ], so people won't
get confused
which thread to check.
I'm -1, it looks like not all issues in last round are resolved:
- The maven wrapper license
Hello Incubator Community:
This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating)
version 2.0.0-RC3
The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release
Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review
Hi
Thank you for your answer. There is another question I would like to ask, is it
necessary to copy the source code of the 3rd party library of the apache
license, in addition to keeping the header, do we need to make additional
declarations in our notices file?
Vaughn
On 2023/01/30 21:59:54
11 matches
Mail list logo
