I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well.
> Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if
> the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER
> should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information.
Best,
OK. My major intention is to sync the discussion to the list. If "lazy
consensus" is too eager to use, I'm OK to make it clear that it's still
encouraged for everyone on the list to give more inputs :D
Best,
tison.
sebb 于2024年5月25日周六 16:26写道：
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
> >
On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 09:10, tison wrote:
>
> A lazy consensus is met at [1].
Sorry, but I don't think it is correct to to use that designation here.
I don't think the discussion has been open long enough to say that
consensus has been achieved, nor was there an explicit call for
opinions.
All
On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
> released code.
That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
the Incubator.
A lazy consensus is met at [1]. I support Justin's opinion that "we were
not too prescriptive on the exact wording". But this patch can be used as a
reference for a good starting point for other podlings.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/incubator-horaedb/pull/1535#issuecomment-2130634831
Best,
Hi,
Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
released code.
For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
For the download links, should it be the link of the
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
?
Thanks,
Junchao
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Keyong Zhou
ZhangJian He 于2024年5月25日周六 10:15写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I also found a typo of `GitHub`
> >> Xiaojin Fang (xiao...@datastrato.com) (GitHubb:FANNG1) - Datastrato
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoothzj
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024
+1 (binding) from me, and I checked the following items:
- [X] Download links are valid.
- [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for the repository.
- [X] All files have
+1 (non-binding)
I also found a typo of `GitHub`
>> Xiaojin Fang (xiao...@datastrato.com) (GitHubb:FANNG1) - Datastrato
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:35 PM Liu Ted wrote:
> +1 with best wishes.
> Ted
>
>在 2024 年 5月 月 24 日週五，時間：22:02 ，
Carry my +1 binding vote from dev list.
Best,
tison.
Suyan 于2024年5月24日周五 22:20写道：
> +1 binding from suyanhanx
>
> I checked:
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [x]
+1 with best wishes.
Ted
在 2024 年 5月 月 24 日週五，時間：22:02 ， PJ Fanning 寫道： +1
project looks in a good position to join the Apache Incubator
On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 14:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Kent
>
> That's a good question, and it's also a fair topic in TLP:
> contribution
+1 binding from suyanhanx
I checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
[x] Can build on macOS(arm64)
nit: You guys didn't add
+1 project looks in a good position to join the Apache Incubator
On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 14:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Kent
>
> That's a good question, and it's also a fair topic in TLP:
> contribution is not only code, anything helping the project and
> community to grow
Hi Kent
That's a good question, and it's also a fair topic in TLP:
contribution is not only code, anything helping the project and
community to grow (documentation, participation on the mailing list,
events, etc) is as good as code. So, an initial list should balance
"technical/coding"
I currently don’t see anything you would need to do … just maybe some more
Incubator members to do a vote …
Let me advertise this … It’s a really simple to review project as they have not
really copied anything from other projects, and everything is in a shape I
would wish more of our more
Thanks Kent for your attention.
Like described in proposal, the contributions in other ways rather than
code will also get counted in initial committers.
Xu has done some great work in promoting Gravitino in public event and
blog, and help us to find important bugs in their production environment,
+1 (binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files - a lot of image files for docs
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source
On 2024/05/24 07:21:40 Shawn Yang wrote:
> Carry my
Hi,
Chris
Sorry, I saw from the d...@answer.apache.org mailing list that the content
of your email ended with Kumfo's voting information, so when I transferred
to the incubator to vote, I didn't bring your voting results and counted
you. The result of this vote is still not enough.
By the way,
You did carry over my vote from the dev list, as I asked you to?
Chris
Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Datum: Freitag, 24. Mai 2024 um 10:25
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [REMINDER] The Apache Answer project v1.3.1-RC2 (Round2) has been
waiting for votes for quite some time now
Hi
I have a question about the initial committer list
Xiao Xu (GitHub: theoryxu), with only 1 credit[1], has been added to the list.
However, some of the contributors from the TOP10, such as qqqttt123[2]
and ch3yne[3], are not included.
Could you provide additional details to confirm Xu's
Hi
I will check the release today. Sorry for the delay.
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:20 AM Shuailing LI wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Answer 1.3.1-RC2 version has been waiting for voting for the
> fifth day, and there are currently no IPMC members voting. So, if any IPMC
>
Hello,
The Apache Answer 1.3.1-RC2 version has been waiting for voting for the
fifth day, and there are currently no IPMC members voting. So, if any IPMC
members have some spare time, please help us get the vote done.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/h6mn9d0kpdbwnjpc65t94sdzpv4g5vqm
Best
+1
-Ayush
> On 24 May 2024, at 12:20 PM, 张铎 wrote:
>
> +1
>
> The project already has a good community and the mentors and lots of
> the initial committers are already familiar with open source,
> especially the Apache way.
>
> I think joining the incubator will benefit both sides, either
The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
(and the signature button does not link to the signature)
Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
formally released.
The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
code that has passed
Carry my no-binding +1.
Best Regards,
Chaokun Yang
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:21 PM Shawn Yang wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Fury(Incubating) v0.5.1-rc2.
>
> The Apache Fury community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> Fury(incubating)
+1
The project already has a good community and the mentors and lots of
the initial committers are already familiar with open source,
especially the Apache way.
I think joining the incubator will benefit both sides, either the
project or the ASF.
Thanks.
Xuanwo 于2024年5月24日周五 12:15写道：
>
> +1
A concrete proposal for the HoraeDB situation:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-horaedb/pull/1535
Best,
tison.
tison 于2024年5月24日周五 08:03写道：
> Hi,
>
> This is a discussed topic at [1].
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kxvdkrf8g8yr6hww1n08r21xdy67y4ok
>
> I agree on the '(Incubating)'
+1 wish you have fun in the Apache community.
On Fri, May 24, 2024, at 11:59, Nicholas wrote:
> +1. Looking forward to unified data catalog service for a
> high-performance, geo-distributed and federated metadata lake.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicholas Jiang
>
>
>
>
> 在 2024-05-24 01:25:31，"larry
+1. Looking forward to unified data catalog service for a high-performance,
geo-distributed and federated metadata lake.
Regards,
Nicholas Jiang
在 2024-05-24 01:25:31，"larry mccay" 写道：
>Looks interesting to me.
>I would be willing to be an additional mentor or join the initial set of
Greetings,
I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache ResilientDB
(Incubating) website, now live at https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for improved
user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for
Hi,
This is a discussed topic at [1].
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kxvdkrf8g8yr6hww1n08r21xdy67y4ok
I agree on the '(Incubating)' in the repo description part.
For the disclaimer part, [1] first had:
> I would be for requiring the incubator disclaimer text in the project's
> README.
Hi,
> Whilst the DISCLAIMER file is helpful, and having '(Incubating)' in
> the repo description/About, neither of these are all that obvious.
Yep, that should be done.
> It seems to me that the repo README should also contain the Incubator
> disclaimer, as is done on website pages.
That is
Looks interesting to me.
I would be willing to be an additional mentor or join the initial set of
team members if there is interest.
+1
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:21 AM Charles Zhang
wrote:
> +1
> It looks like a good project with many application scenarios.
>
> Best wishes,
> Charles Zhang
>
Now that 'incubator' is no longer required as part of Git repo names,
the question arises: what notification is required to ensure users are
aware of the status?
Whilst the DISCLAIMER file is helpful, and having '(Incubating)' in
the repo description/About, neither of these are all that obvious.
+1
It looks like a good project with many application scenarios.
Best wishes,
Charles Zhang
from Apache InLong
tison 于2024年5月23日周四 23:08写道：
> +1 looks promising and I believe this initial group and the mentors :D
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> 俊平堵 于2024年5月23日周四 22:53写道：
>
> > +1. Thanks JB for the
+1 looks promising and I believe this initial group and the mentors :D
Best,
tison.
俊平堵 于2024年5月23日周四 22:53写道：
> +1. Thanks JB for the proposal.
> Unified Data Catalog is more and more important in the data and AI domain.
> Project gravitino should be the first one in ASF to address this
+1. Thanks JB for the proposal.
Unified Data Catalog is more and more important in the data and AI domain.
Project gravitino should be the first one in ASF to address this area.
The project is very active and has outstanding contributors from different
organizations and companies.
Glad to see it
Hello everyone,
This is a call for the vote to release Apache Fury(Incubating) v0.5.1-rc2.
The Apache Fury community has voted and approved the release of Apache
Fury(incubating) v0.5.1-rc2. We now kindly request the IPMC members
review and vote for this release.
Apache Fury(incubating) - A
+1 non-binding I checked: [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and
PGP signatures are valid. [x] Source code distributions have correct names
matching the current release. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for
each Answer repo. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. [x] No
Hi folks,
We would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator: Gravitino.
Gravitino is a high-performance, geo-distributed, and federated
metadata lake designed to manage metadata seamlessly across diverse
data sources, vendors, and regions. Its primary goal is to provide
users with
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:31 AM tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
You can review the implementation PRs at:
* https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/127
* https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/128
Hopefully it's clear and we can use the description to guide podlings to
make progress.
Best,
tison.
tison 于2024年5月14日周二 00:08写道：
> Thanks for your
Hello,
This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) version
v1.3.1-RC2.
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/z8k2h7320cz1slx2qt4bfxtf2xj6w39s
Vote Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/w9bgvpowxf30h4w1p3w2h2qyqfw089s8
The release candidates:
Thanks for the additional information, Tison! Really appreciate it.
Certainly right after the release this will be a top priority for me.
The Apache KIE project publishes a lot of artifacts to a lot of
different places, so this is all a little bit overwhelming to do for a
first release. I'm glad
Hi Tiago,
> How? Every package we ever published to NPM under KIE is owned by
> https://www.npmjs.com/~kie-tools-bot now (some of them were
> removed/renamed). We can give control to the ~theasf user, no problem.
You can open an INFRA JIRA ticket like [1].
[1]
Thanks all for the replies.
I'll try to postpone renaming the packages we have today, so we'll
start the release vote without this renaming. All packages will
include the DISCLAIMER in their README files. E.g.,
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/blob/main/packages/dmn-editor/README.md
The Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
version 3.0 of Apache StormCrawler (Incubating).
StormCrawler is a collection of resources for building low-latency,
customisable and scalable web crawlers on Apache Storm.
Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0
Hi all,
Thanks for your review and vote for Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0
Release Candidate 2
I'm happy to announce the vote has passed:
4 binding votes, 1 non-binding, no +0 or -1 votes.
Thanks for reviewing and voting.
+4 (binding) +1, from:
- PJ Fanning
- Dave Fisher
- Richard
Dates for next board report:
Wed June 05 - Podling reports due by end of day
Sun June 09 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun June 09 - Summary due by end of day
Tue June 11 - Mentor signoff due by end of day
Wed June 12 - Report submitted to Board
Wed June 19 - Board meeting
Expected to
Here’s my 2 cents.
Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant
that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away.
For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary
convenience packaging?
Best,
Dave
> On May 15, 2024, at 1:13 PM,
Tison,
Thanks for the reply!
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:43 PM tison wrote:
>
> We have an official account on NPM [1] and the associated org [2] (cc @Mark
> Thomas IIRC who manages this account).
>
> [1] https://www.npmjs.com/~theasf
> [2] https://www.npmjs.com/org/apache
>
> Both of these
We have an official account on NPM [1] and the associated org [2] (cc @Mark
Thomas IIRC who manages this account).
[1] https://www.npmjs.com/~theasf
[2] https://www.npmjs.com/org/apache
Both of these associations can improve the verification and brand for your
release, while you may use the
Shawn,
Does that mean you didn't publish anything to NPM as part of your
releases while in the incubator?
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:31 PM Shawn Yang wrote:
>
> Hi Tiago,
>
> From the current incubator release policy, you need to rename all npm
> packages to apache-xxx before releasing. The
Hi Tiago,
>From the current incubator release policy, you need to rename all npm
packages to apache-xxx before releasing. The packages released before
should be on to left intact.
I came across same issue when we release apache fury. In your case, most
packages starts with kie. Fury has similar
Podlings are allowed some leeway. Ideally, you should aim to eventually
rename your binary artifacts to include Apache KIE branding. I think it
should be ok to make an initial release with the existing naming,
especially if you comply with the other requirements in the NPM
distribution guidelines
Hi general@incubator,
The distribution guidelines [1] say packages published to NPM should
be named `apache-`, however, at KIE, we have a somewhat big
set of packages that are published under these scopes:
- @kie-tools/*
- @kie-tools-core/*
- @kie-tools-scripts/*
There are also some VS Code
+1 (Binding) carry over from dev@
Thanx Richard for driving the release
-Ayush
> On 14 May 2024, at 5:05 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
>
>> Am 13.05.2024 um 09:41 schrieb Richard Zowalla :
>> Hi folks,
>> I have posted release
Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
> Am 13.05.2024 um 09:41 schrieb Richard Zowalla :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> This is our first release after joining the
Hi everyone,
The Apache StreamPark (Incubating) Team is happy to announce
the release of Apache StreamPark (Incubating) 2.1.4.
Apache StreamPark(incubating) is an easy-to-use streaming application
development framework and operation platform that makes stream processing
easier!
Download Links:
Hi all,
Thanks for your review and vote for "Release Apache StreamPark (Incubating)
2.1.4-rc2"
I'm happy to announce the vote has passed:
5 binding votes, 1 non-binding, no +0 or -1 votes.
Thanks for reviewing and voting.
+5 (binding) +1, from:
- Kent Yao
- Charles Zhang
- Gang Li
- tison
-
Thanks everyone for review and vote, 72H passed. I'll announce the vote
result soon.
Best,
Shaokang Lv
Suyan 于2024年5月14日周二 00:01写道：
> +1 binding from suyanhanx
>
> I checked:
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
>
Hello Incubator Community: I'm cancelling this vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/w6gkfcyonrxjmcv0pffbhg2h1q6c1l9c
Thanks to sebb and Suyan for their careful verification, I will re-upload
the release files and use the official location for the KEYS file. I'll fix
them and start the new round
Hi,
> Thank you all for the inputs, but we still seeking clarity on NPM.
>
> We - Apache KIE podling - are trying to get a single release procedure for
> all binaries, but with lack of NPM infra for staging makes it really
> complex.
>
> I notice that OpenDAL publishes to NPM, is there anyone
Thank you all for the inputs, but we still seeking clarity on NPM.
We - Apache KIE podling - are trying to get a single release procedure for
all binaries, but with lack of NPM infra for staging makes it really
complex.
I notice that OpenDAL publishes to NPM, is there anyone involved in OpenDAL
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:40, Suyan wrote:
>
> -1 binding
>
> When I try to download the candidate, I find that the source file's size is
> 0B.
> Please recheck it.
>
> I tried the following link:
>
I may be misinterpreting 'live website' but it is quite common for Apache
projects to have a 'staged' version of their website (i.e. a pre-release
version of the web site).
https://kie.apache.org/ could also have a https://kie.staged.apache.org/
https://pekko.staged.apache.org/ is a staged
Thank you for the prompt responses.
We're aware that for Maven artifacts we could "promote" them after publishing
them to a staging repo.
But for container images, for example, I'm not sure I understand how such
process would look like. Prior to being in Apache, we used to push images to
For Java jars, the ASF has repository.apache.org - a Nexus instance that
can be used to stage and later release jars.
The login credentials are the same credentials you use to access other ASF
resources.
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 21:28, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Tiago,
>
>
> Il Lun 13 Mag 2024,
Tiago,
Il Lun 13 Mag 2024, 22:11 Tiago Bento ha scritto:
> Hello general@incubator,
>
> My name is Tiago Bento (@tiagobento on GitHub), and I’m one of the
> committers of the KIE project of the incubator.
>
> We’re gearing towards our first release under Apache, and we’re very
> excited to be
Hello general@incubator,
My name is Tiago Bento (@tiagobento on GitHub), and I’m one of the
committers of the KIE project of the incubator.
We’re gearing towards our first release under Apache, and we’re very
excited to be approaching this important milestone.
Some resources [1] [2] that we
Yes. Thanks. Should be:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/RELEASING.md
Added it to the related issue which also includes the remark by Sebb.
Am Dienstag, dem 14.05.2024 um 00:03 +0800 schrieb Suyan:
> Hi,
>
> The link of RELEASE.md in your email template is broken:
>
Thanks for your participation!
This vote has passed with 12 +1 bindings, 2 -1 bindings, 13 +1
non-bindings, 2 +0 bindings, 3 -0 bindings, and 2 -0 non-bindings.
I'll follow the update tasks on the incubator site this week and help
podlings make the upgrade with help from INFRA if the podlings
Hi,
The link of RELEASE.md in your email template is broken:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/RELEASING.md
I think you may want to fix this.
Sincerely,
Suyan
Richard Zowalla 于2024年5月13日周一 15:41写道：
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
>
+1 binding from suyanhanx
I checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
[x] No unexpected binary files.
[x] Can compile from source.
Sincerely,
Suyan
Shaokang Lv 于2024年5月9日周四 13:50写道：
>
> Hello Incubator Community:
>
>
-1 binding
When I try to download the candidate, I find that the source file's size is 0B.
Please recheck it.
I tried the following link:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/answer/1.3.1-incubating-RC2/apache-answer-1.3.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
Sincerely,
Suyan
Shuailing LI
same with my +1 (non-binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
Julien
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:01, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
> > On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have posted
Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
Best,
Dave
> On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> This is our first release
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 08:53, Shuailing LI wrote:
>
> Sorry, there was a clerical error in the email I just sent, corrected here.
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) version
> v1.3.1-RC2.
>
> The vote thread:
>
Thanks, sebb - created an issue for tracking this on our side (update
our vote templates)
Am Montag, dem 13.05.2024 um 15:31 +0100 schrieb sebb:
> On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 08:41, Richard Zowalla
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> >
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 08:41, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> This is our first release after joining the ASF incubator as a
> poddling. It is a breaking change with
+1 binding
I checked:
* Download links valid.
* Signature and checksum match.
* LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER are included in both source and binary
releases. The content looks good to me.
* No binary files in the source release
* Compile from sources.
Best,
tison.
li gang 于2024年5月13日周一
+1 (binding)
I checked
- Download links are valid.
- Files have the word incubating in their name.
- Checksums and signatures are valid.
- DISCLAIMER,LICENSE and NOTICE files exist.
- No unexpected Binary Files in the source release.
Shaokang Lv 于2024年5月9日周四 13:50写道：
> Hello Incubator
+1 binding
* license/notice/disclaimer are ok
* incubating in name
* most files have source headers - for future releases, it would be good to
review if the source headers can be added to some of the config files and
scripts
* no compiled binaries - there are a few gzipped binaries used in tests
The Incubator PMC prefer that the Git commit ids are included. The git tags are
useful too but git tags can be moved to different commits.
This RC appears to be for git commit e15d84d13879d217bd095d25d5cf1f5ca913dade
On 2024/05/13 07:41:42 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted
+1 (binding) from me, and I checked the following items:
- [X] Download links are valid.
- [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for the repository.
- [X] All files have
Sorry, there was a clerical error in the email I just sent, corrected here.
Hello,
This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) version
v1.3.1-RC2.
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0851fqyw36q0xvkjwkxt4fkym623bgmq
Vote Result:
Hi folks,
I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
(Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
This is our first release after joining the ASF incubator as a
poddling. It is a breaking change with renamings in the group ids and
the removal of the elasticsearch
+1 (binding), I have checked:
[✓] The checksums and signatures are validated
[✓] The LICENSE & NOTICE files are okay
[✓] DISCLAIMER is present
[✓] No binary files found in the source release
[✓] Incubating in the name
[✓] Build from source
Kent Yao
On 2024/05/09 15:28:13 Huajie Wang wrote:
>
Dear Justin
Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version of the
website to address all your comments.
Here is a quick response to your feedback.
*- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
companies funded basic research and development at
Hi,
A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is problematic
from an ASF point
I'm sorry, there was a problem with the formatting of the email I sent just
now.
Hello,
This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) version
v1.3.2-RC2.
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0851fqyw36q0xvkjwkxt4fkym623bgmq
Vote Result:
Hello, This is a call for vote to release Apache Answer(Incubating) version
v1.3.2-RC2. The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0851fqyw36q0xvkjwkxt4fkym623bgmq
Vote Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/3oqn8mqp7jc3sm5nz1k93y1rgys03m13
The release candidates:
Greetings,
I'm pleased to update you on our latest improvements to Apache ResilientDB
(Incubating). We've implemented systemd services to tackle previous
downtime issues and introduced a new status page for real-time monitoring
at https://status.resilientdb.com/.
Our website now features updated
Here is my +1 binding.
Reading from the feedback above, I suggest that the INFRA team would prefer
that podlings handle branding by themselves, and it's good for podlings to
understand what we should add the DISCLAIMER and how to identify the
incubating status.
Besides, we can avoid the large
+1 (binding)
-Vinay
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 5:48 PM, Suyan wrote:
> -0 binding from suyanhanx
>
> Sincerely,
> Suyan
>
> tison 于2024年5月8日周三 08:32写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> > proposals:
> >
> > 1. Establish a consensus to
-0 binding from suyanhanx
Sincerely,
Suyan
tison 于2024年5月8日周三 08:32写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator-
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On May 11, 2024, at 16:02, ConradJam wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> tison 于2024年5月8日周三 08:32写道：
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
>> proposals:
>>
>> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally
+1 (non-binding)
tison 于2024年5月8日周三 08:32写道：
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub
> repo to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
> 2. Allow existing
+1 (non-binding)
On 2024/05/09 08:15:10 Imba Jin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> For example, after the project is donated(in incubation), when users visit
> "github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph" or "github.com/apache/hugegraph", it
> could automatically jump to
On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 21:11, Apratim Shukla
wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The website has been updated with the required Incubator disclaimer as
> requested. The changes are now live at
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
Thanks, however I could not find a download page.
Also, the menu
1 - 100 of 76967 matches
Mail list logo
