This conjures up a mental image of a unicorn with the Apache feather
tickling its nose... I like it.
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 8:36 AM Jerry Shao wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> After discussing with the team, we figured out a new name "Uniffle"
> (Unified/Universal Shuffle). And we did a name searching,
+0.9 (non-binding).
I think the project is a great idea. I think the name is going to run into
a lot of issues with trademarks and pre-existing software products and
would recommend the project consider a new name before incubating.
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:44 AM Jerry Shao wrote:
> Hi all,
+1 (non binding)
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 5:57 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care
> I would expect any one making total commits of 100s, 1,000s or more lines
of code major/significant.
That assumes it's their own code. There are three contributors in the
1000s of lines range, and while these contributors have done a great
service to the project, the vast majority of those
Can you clarify what you mean by an "Apache Java project"?
- A TLP?
- An incubating project?
- A project anywhere that is released under the Apache license?
There's actually no need to "migrate code" in many cases, just add some
files. Is there a particular use case you are interested in?
On
t;
> So if the project uses only Berkeley DB Java Edition, all is well. If it
> uses Berkeley DB then we have a problem.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
> > On Feb 18, 2021, at 1:46 PM, Daniel B. Widdis wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the clarification, Justin! I missed that
Thank you for the clarification, Justin! I missed that non-commercial
limitation.
I agree that it would be better to replace that dependency,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:41 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My concern is that while it claims it is under the Apache license that is
> only for
Can you be clear on what you mean by "has no standard license file" and "no
open source code channel"?
I started at this download page [1].
On that page near the top is a link to "more details" on licensing, which
points to [2].
The link there for "Open source license for Berkeley DB Java
+1 non-binding
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:03 PM Mike Beckerle wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would now call for people to please officially vote on this proposal.
>
> This vote thread will be open for 72 hours - ending on Friday Feb 12,
> 5:15pm ET.US (UTC-5)
>
> The discussion thread already contained
+1 (non-binding). I'm interested in getting involved in this project!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 8:33 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Wayang (
>
Someone needs to have "Admin" access to the repository. Most committers
just have "Write" access.
I would suggest filing an Issue at the repository stating these
requirements.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:22 PM Jialiang Li wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> This is Jack from LinkedIn Pinot team. We’re
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 4:39 AM Nick Kew wrote:
> Whose initiative is this? If it's you acting as dictator, the first thing
> to do is discuss
> it within your own community. If it's coming from them and they're
> pressing you
> with positive reasons to move, that's a good start.
>
The idea
12 matches
Mail list logo
